[ad_1]
Why did President Trump do it?
Why would he create this fire storm on the acceptance of the dirt of a foreign government?
Why did he answer – finally – a hypothetical question from George Stephanopoulos?
Why would he send a message that it was perfectly acceptable after two years of fighting the Mueller inquiry, which had revealed that Russia had blatantly interfered with the 2016 elections, but that no inappropriate cooperation from the from Trump or his associates?
MSNBC STEPHANIE RUHLE ASKS FOR A MISCONDUCT MAY BE REPORTED AS "A THREAT OF SECURITY"
Why would you want to dig a hole with comments that even some of its biggest media supporters and close allies, like Lindsey Graham, do not defend?
In the oval office, Stephanopoulos asked Trump if his campaign, if it was approached by a foreign government like Russia or China with information about the opponents, was to call the FBI.
"I think you maybe both," Trump said. "I think you might want to – listen, there's nothing wrong with listening." "If someone calls from a country [like] Norway [and said] "We have information about your opponent," oh, I think I want to hear it. "
At another point, Trump said that if he was approached, "Oh, let me call the FBI." Give me a break, life does not work like that. "
And: "When you speak honestly to members of Congress, they do it too, they always do it, it's like that, what's called oppo research."
By the way, many campaigns rely on oppo research – which may be perfectly legitimate – but not on foreign regimes.
SIGN UP FOR THE PODCAST BUZZMETER MEDIA MEDIA, A RIFF OF THE MOST HISTORIC DAYS
Sometimes Trump just commits the franchise, in a way that hurts him politically. In 2017, after the administration claimed it had sacked Jim Comey based on a memo from Rod Rosenstein, he had told NBC's Lester Holt that he would have fired the director FBI "disregarding the recommendation" and pondering his role in the investigation of Russia.
Trump's voice was a mixture of challenge and exasperation as he paralyzed Stephanopoulos, as he knew perfectly well that the politically acceptable answer was "call the FBI", but refused to follow.
DONALD TRUMP JR. REFER TO THE ORIGINAL TESTIMONY IN ITS INCOME FOR THE INTERVIEW OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE
The context is important. The two men started talking about the return of Donald Trump Jr. on the hill for an in camera testimony. It would be the Trump Tower meeting in 2016 during which a Russian lawyer claimed to offer negative information about Hillary Clinton.
So Trump might have thought that if he had said he would rush to call the FBI these days, it might have been thrown at him again in the case of his son.
Laura Ingraham of Fox, among those who were intrigued, said: "Apart from the question of why George Stephanopoulos stands alongside the president in the Oval Office – I do not know who approved that – but that's not the case. is this notion of acceptance? Foreign information about an opponent? Is it a risk for President Trump …? Why he was put in this situation exceeds me. "
But who will tell the president not to do the interview? He does not even have a director of communication these days.
Nancy Pelosi had a day on the field saying "everyone should be dismayed" and that Trump "does not know the right to the wrong" while Kevin McCarthy seemed uncomfortable to try to divert the questions but admitted that he would call the authorities in such a situation.
Yesterday, Trump attempted to tidy up his business on Twitter, claiming that he had recently met the Queen of England and the British, Irish, French and Polish leaders: "Should I immediately call the FBI about these calls and meetings? " He obviously confuses daily diplomacy with the transport of the land.
TRUMP FLIPS SCRIPT ON THE OPENING OF DEM ON COMMENTS ON FOREIGN DIRT
The president also said: "My complete answer is rarely interpreted by Fake News Media, they deliberately leave out the role that matters." In fact, I've seen many news programs broadcast lengthy versions of the Stephanopoulos exchange.
I know that Trump's supporters say, "Hey, did not Hillary pay the money?" etc. But the deviceism will not change what the president said.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
I am not a Trump-Basher. At one level, the turmoil of the media may be an overreaction to what was, after all, a hypothetical exchange with a journalist. There is no new evidence, incriminating documents or embarrassing emails regarding real contact with foreign agents.
In any honest assessment, Trump's words can not really be defended. At least, in this case, they are just words.
[ad_2]
Source link