Trump GOP challengers qualify canceled primaries



[ad_1]

"In the United States, citizens are choosing their leaders," said former Republican Mark Sanford of South Carolina, former Republican Joe Walsh of Illinois and the former governor of Massachusetts, Bill Weld, in an editorial released Friday by the Washington Post.

"The main nomination process is the only opportunity for Republicans to be heard to decide who will represent our party," they added. "Let these voices be heard."

Their reaction comes after party leaders in Kansas, South Carolina and Nevada have canceled their Republican primaries, with Arizona to be official this weekend. The suppressed primaries are an additional hurdle for long-term challengers, who are already fighting the outgoing president, who, according to a CNN / SSRS poll, is getting an 88 percent approval rate among Republicans.

It is not without precedent for Republicans or state democrats to decide not to hold a presidential primary while the outgoing president presents himself as an undisputed candidate. In South Carolina, one of the leading primary states of the early period, Republicans decided to eliminate their presidential primaries in 1984 and 2004, when Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush were in the running for their second term. Clinton and Barack Obama in the race for reelection.

"Each of us believes we can better lead the party, the same goes for the outgoing president, let's take our case to the public," wrote the three GOP candidates on Friday. "The saying that the best wins" is an essential value that the Republican party must honor if it wants the American people to be respected.

"The cowards are fleeing the fighting," they added, in a slightly veiled blow to Trump. "The warriors fight for what they believe in. The United States respects warriors, only weak competitions fear."

The trio emphasized that the moving Democratic primary was on the march, saying that ideological challenges were a central element not only of the US government but also of the Republican Party.

"Do Republicans really want to be the party with a nomination process that looks more like Russia or China than our American tradition?" the group writes. "Under this president, the sense of truth has been challenged like never before … Do we, Republicans, accept all this as inevitable? Do we leave it to the Democrats to defend the principles and values ​​that there is, every republican would have accepted formed the foundations of our party? "

The three candidates also raised the risk of costly court challenges to states, predicting that they would likely exceed the costs of hosting the primary. Walsh told CNN, after South Carolina's decision on Saturday, that he would "fight legally and against all other options" to challenge the states.

"Let's spend the next six months trying to attract new voters to our party instead of demanding allegiance to a predetermined choice," wrote the three. "If we believe that our party represents the best hope for the future of the United States, let us convey our message to the public and prove that we are right."

Rebecca Buck of CNN contributed to this report.

[ad_2]

Source link