[ad_1]
President Donald Trump would be "enraged" by the fact that Ford, Volkswagen, BMW and Honda have reached an agreement with California to gradually reduce the amount of pollution emitted by their new cars. the New York Times. The deal directly contradicts (and potentially threatens) one of his administration's fundamental efforts: an attempt to lower the even stricter standards set by Barack Obama's Environmental Protection Agency.
Trump has even summoned other automakers – General Motors, Fiat Chrysler and Toyota – to the White House to urge them to adhere to the plan of the administration, according to the statement. the New York Times.
The new agreement with California imposes on these four manufacturers (and all others who adhere to the pact) a standard similar to that established by the EPA of Obama. Automakers should reduce overall emissions from their new fleet of vehicles until the 2026 model year, which will make new cars more fuel efficient. Given that other states are following California's air transport regulations, the deal could potentially split the market if the Trump administration adopts a federal rule with less stringent standards. the NYT The report also mentions Mercedes-Benz as the next car manufacturer likely to join the other four countries of the pact.
The automakers originally lobbied Trump to ease the regime of the Obama era, before and after taking office. But instead of just loosening the regulatory belt, the EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have finally proposed what would amount to completely canceling the Obama era regime. The Trump administration would freeze rising energy efficiency standards to 2020 levels (about 37 km / gallon) and no longer hold automakers to the ultimate goal of an average saving of more than 50 km / gallon by 2025 .
The Trump administration based its proposal on the idea that the high standards of the Obama era would make new cars more expensive, pushing consumers to buy older cars or to get them into the new era. stick to the one they already own. Since older cars are generally less efficient and lack the security features of the news, the Trump administration argues in favor of the exchange of environmental gains of the last five years of the Obama rule in order to achieve initial cost savings and reduce costs. injury and death related to an accident.
Trump says as much in a tweet on Wednesday, claiming that it gives "politically correct car companies" the opportunity to reduce the average price of a car by "more than $ 3,000, while enhancing the safety of cars" (although the proposal for the EPA and NHTSA did not do with New safer cars) in exchange for "[v]The impact on the environment is very low. He described the leaders of the auto sector as "crazy" even though it was not clear whether he was referring to the leaders of Ford, Volkswagen, BMW and Honda.
Many experts do not agree with the calculations of the Trump administration. Some believe that the potential savings on the posted price of new cars would likely be offset by the increased cost of fuel over the life of these vehicles, even though the price of gasoline remains low. With less fuel efficient cars, the rollback could also introduce hundreds of millions of tonnes of CO2 into the air and increase oil consumption by more than a billion barrels, according to EPA estimates.
"Clean car standards are the most effective policy in the fight against climate change and the transport sector is the biggest source of carbon pollution in the country that causes climate change," said the defense group. Sierra Club non-profit rights in a statement Wednesday. "The Trump administration's support for more dirty and less efficient vehicles would help inject more carbon into our air."
EPA and NHTSA to unveil final version of dismantling of Trump administration that has been promising this year, but the New York Times points out that staff members of these agencies "are struggling to put together a coherent technical and scientific analysis required by law to implement a rule change of this magnitude".
[ad_2]
Source link