Trump promises to challenge Hill's subpoenas, but will the public be concerned?



[ad_1]

There is a constitutional crisis everywhere.

But I'm not sure that will happen in this way with much of the audience.

In swearing not to cooperate with a series of Democratic House investigations, President Trump is betting that people are fed up with the entire culture of investigation and that it will not hurt him. politically. And he also bets that, having survived Mueller's investigation, he can give Congress a petty and partisan air in the pursuit of what he termed "nonsense".

MJ REJECTS SUPPORT FROM HOME AT DEMAND FOR BEST OFFICIAL JOHN GORE

The fundamental problem with this approach is that Congress is an equal branch of government. Regardless of the results of Bob Mueller's investigation, lawmakers have the responsibility to oversee executive power just as Republicans did during the Obama and Clinton administrations.

Trump nonetheless stated categorically to the Washington Post that he saw no reason to comply with Hill's growing demands for witnesses and documents. "There is no reason to go further, and especially in Congress where he is very partisan – obviously very partisan … I do not want people to testify in front of a party, because that is "They do it, they do it," he said.

The president was also indifferent to reporters yesterday: "The subpoena is ridiculous … We just did the Mueller witch hunt where you had 18 really angry Democrats who hate President Trump, they hate him with passion."

Among the issues in dispute: Trump is about to invoke the privilege of the executive to prevent former White House lawyer Don McGahn from testifying under subpoena.

McGahn became a key witness in the investigation led by the special advocate, stating that he had refused the president 's order to have Mueller fired and threatened to resign.

TRUMP VELE AGAINST ALL "THE" SUB-POINAS AGAINST ADMINISTRATION, DEMANDS A REQUEST FOR THE TESTIMONY OF MCGAHN "RIDICULE"

Another House committee threatened to blame Carl Kline, former Director of Personnel Security for the White House, for not testifying about security clearances. The Treasury is also resisting the House's request for Trump's tax returns.

These battles last a very long time and often end up in court. Richard Nixon used the executive privilege to try to protect Watergate's concealment. But every modern president (and some less) has run into Congress, usually the opposition party, about hearings and investigations. For Barack Obama, it was among others Benghazi and Fast and Furious.

Democrats are naturally indignant at Trumpian tactics, Nancy Pelosi declaring: "We now see the administration attacking the reality of the facts that presented themselves to the American people".

What is very unusual in Trump's approach, is that rather than fighting one or two requests for specific reasons, he appeared with the Post to simply make a general statement of non-cooperation .

In fact, Axios cited a "familiar source with the president's legal strategy": "Trump can take the time by taking a tough position.The president thinks it's in his political interest to continue the fight and to make it more difficult. " the Democrats to have a consistent message ".

Trump told reporters that Congress should return to solving problems. "They are not impartial people, the Democrats are trying to win 2020," he said. This echoes what the Liberals said on behalf of Bill Clinton during the allegations that led to his dismissal, that everyone should "move on", which has become the name of a left-wing group. .

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

But all this can become a background noise for average voters, already numbed by two years of constant investigation and the media monitoring of this president. They may not share the view that constitutional principles and the separation of powers are at stake. If the whole back and forth seems unduly partisan, many people may reject rhetoric as a mere game in a hyper polarized capital.

Footnote: Trump had some exchanges with Post reporter Robert Costa, who had tweeted, "President Trump called me tonight, in response to my request for comment on a profile article on a character from Trump World, he took a few questions about his administration's stalemate with Congress and we will publish these remarks tonight. "

Yesterday, Trump proposed this provocation on Twitter: "I did not call Bob Costa from the Washington Post.He called me (he made his call)! Just more fake news."

Uh, is not that what Costa said? Maybe Trump just did not like the story.

[ad_2]

Source link