[ad_1]
The substitutes of President Donald Trump have attempted to clarify his tweeted proposal to allow detained immigrants to visit "sanctuary cities" Sunday, but have left the case as unstable as when the president had once again presented the plan that his own government had declared dead.
White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders and Presidential Advisor Kellyanne Conway appeared at This week with George Stephanopolous and Meet the press, respectively, to discuss immigration. Sanders approved the proposal, but did not say that the White House's policy would be to place migrants from the US-Mexico border into liberal districts with self-proclaimed "sanctuary cities," such as the Nancy Pelosi headquarters in San Francisco. Francisco.
White House officials said the plan was discussed and rejected. Friday, however, Trump contradicted his aides and tweeted that the White House "continued to give great importance" to the idea. This meant that on Sunday his officials were scrambling to defend the proposal to stage shows on the weekends.
Sanders presented this idea as a potentially bipartisan victory when he spoke to Stephanopolous on Sunday.
"The president appreciates this idea and the Democrats have said that they want these people to go into their communities, let's see if it works and if everyone wins," said the press officer.
However, Sanders was careful to point out that the idea has not yet come true.
"Whether it advances or not, it remains to be determined," she said. "This was raised at the staff level at the start and pushed back. The Chair wants us to re-examine the matter so that it's done and to have a thorough and thorough review. "
Sanders representative Hogan Gidley was not as cautious during an appearance in Fox News on Saturday. He said the White House was already working with ICE and DHS to implement the plan.
"They said they wanted all these illegal aliens to be part of their communities," Gidley told Jeanine Pirro. "We work with DHS, we work with ICE, to try to make sure that happens, because, after all, that's what they want."
Trump shared Gidley's enthusiasm in a series of tweets on Saturday night in which he once again pleaded for the transfer of immigrants held in sanctuary towns and claimed that such a transfer was perfectly legal .
…. So interesting to see the mayor of Oakland and other towns of the Sanctuary, we do not want our "currently detained immigrants" to be released after their release because of the ridiculous rule ordered by a court of 20 days. If they do not want to serve our nation by taking care of them, why would other cities and towns be it?
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 14, 2019
Democrats must change FAST immigration laws. Otherwise, sanctuary cities must ACT immediately to take care of illegal immigrants – and this includes gang members, drug dealers, human traffickers and criminals of all shapes, sizes and types. CHANGE THE LAWS NOW!
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 14, 2019
The United States has the absolute legal right to apprehend illegal immigrants transferred to sanctuary cities. We hereby request that they be cared for at the highest level, especially by the State of California, which is well known for its poor management and high taxes!
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 14, 2019
The Washington Post reported that members of the Trump government, opposed to this idea at its first appearance, told the president that they thought the transfer of detained immigrants was causing urgent financial, legal and logistical problems.
Now, however, it seems that the president's staff may be willing to make immigration policy from his latest tweets, despite the fact that this proposal was rejected because it was too expensive and maybe illegal.
Sure Meet the press, Conway to put the question bluntly, offering a solution to potential immigrants worried about new proposals.
"Do not come," she said. "It's a perilous and perilous journey where there is no guarantee."
The Bad Faith Policy of the Trump City Sanctuary Plan
As Vox's Dara Lind pointed out, Trump's bus plan of immigrants detained to sanctuary towns betrays a dark line of reasoning.
It is extremely unlikely that he would really push for it, as it would make his political opponents "very happy," despite the tweet. Presumably, Trump thinks the opposite is that liberating immigrants on the streets of San Francisco would cause crime and disruption, or that San Francisco residents would be secretly just as anti-immigrant as him and would flip when they actually saw immigrants in their neighborhoods.
The first, of course, only makes sense if Trump believes he has his own lies about immigrant crime – but since it's a lie, there would be no real crime or massive disruption. The second is more difficult to refute but certainly indicates that Trump may not understand that much of the public really disagrees with him about immigration – not just the "sanctuary cities" governments, but the people who elect them.
In early April, the president said he wanted to take ICE "in a more severe direction". His bus route for immigrants held across the country might be the next policy to be adopted as a result of this decision. Although his staff may not have a consistent message on the transport plan, it is clear that he is now back on the table for review.
[ad_2]
Source link