Tucker: Democrats ‘sweeping the law for the people’ is tantamount to ‘enshrining fraud’, as lawmakers seek to quell dissent



[ad_1]

Democrats will control the federal government for decades or more if a sweeping new proposal billed as comprehensive government reform becomes law, Tucker Carlson said on Monday.

Carlson warned of the many dangers of “HR 1.” The “For The People Act,” a nearly 800-page bill sponsored by Maryland Democrat John Sarbanes of Baltimore.

“Law for the People” is the foundation of the Democratic Party’s strategy to control the federal government until the middle age of your grandchildren. Take a look, “warned the host.

“Like most groundbreaking documents, this is not a very exciting read – nothing seems particularly radical at first. The bill begins by declaring that – unlike Section I of the United States Constitution – the Congress has “ultimate power of control over federal elections. “

Carlson noted that under the constitution much of the management of elections is left to the states, but the Democrats’ bill would essentially nationalize what he called the California electoral system.

“As part of our current loss, states can decide how much fraud they will tolerate: Florida requires you to present photo ID to vote. California just wants you to vote Democratic,” a- he declared.

“If HR 1 passes, the 50 states will be California – the entire country will have ballot collection and postal voting. Think about it.”

Carlson said Democrats were essentially taking the exact opposite message from the right-wing riot on Capitol Hill on January 6.

He said crowds of people turned to the civil unrest because millions of people believed the 2020 election was not fair, and they did not come to that conclusion because “the last president told them that “.

“You hear it now as if it’s animals taking the controls and doing what they’re told – but it’s not animals, it’s American citizens who can see what’s going on and draw their own conclusions to. this topic: They have seen the dramatic increase in postal voting, and it has corroded public confidence in our electoral system. They were enraged by it and some of them exploded, ”Carlson said of the rioters.

“According to Democrats, the lesson from that terrible day was that we needed more of the corrupt policies that brought it about in the first place. We need more postal voting, we need more ballot collection. vote: no more corruption! It will unite countries. “

Carlson went on to point out that a line in Sarbanes’ bill says that a state government cannot require voters to provide “any form of identification” when seeking a postal vote.

“Under HR 1, [people] could freely go from house to house and apartment to apartment collecting thousands of unknown ballots, then drop them all in a mailbox. No one would have a clue if these ballots had been tampered with at some point along the way or if there would be a way to prove it if they had been tampered with, ”he continued.

“HR 1 also makes it harder for election observers to file complaints about it because complaining is racist.”

“A system like this is suicidal for democracy and no other free country would tolerate it.”

Carlson further pointed out that Canada and France are banning mail-in ballots, while the ruling party in the United States is calling for the opposite remedy.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The host then contrasted the Democrats ‘call for an open and irresponsible vote with a surprising message of violation of an entity he says is otherwise friendly on the left: Jeff Bezos’ Amazon.

“When it is their power at stake, Democrats have a totally different position,” he said, noting Amazon’s criticism of the postal ballot for its Alabama union election.

“You should know that this is not considered hypocrisy. They don’t care if they are caught breaking their own rules, they are not offended by double standards. They want to power is power grabbing and that’s it, “he said. .

He then referred to the legislation of Rep. Stephanie Murphy, D-Fla., Noting that the Orlando lawmaker is proposing a bill that, in the words of the host, “would prohibit anyone with bad opinions from having important work within the federal government. “

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Believe in prohibited things and you don’t get security clearance. You can’t work here,” he says. “Murphy’s Bill would require federal investigators to ask all applicants whether they” associated or knowingly engaged in activities carried out by an organization or movement that spreads conspiracy theories and false information about the government of the United States “.”

Carlson noted that by Murphy’s standards, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff, D-Calif., Would be potentially unable to serve in his current position – which is in the federal government – due to the allegations. repeated on President Trump’s alleged collusion. with the Kremlin; continue to play a montage of public statements from the Burbank lawmaker.

“That much [Murphy’s bill’s criteria] would include just about everyone currently in power, “Carlson said.” Yes, they were deeply embedded in conspiracy theories that in fact harm our country in measurable ways – but this legislation is not designed to punish them – quite the contrary – this legislation is designed to protect them from your criticism. “

“According to Stephanie Murphy’s Bill, anyone who criticizes Stephanie Murphy could be punished. Does that make sense now?”

[ad_2]

Source link