That's not all, Bulent, why are you breaking it?

Mazhar Alanson said: "I love Atatürk, but I also love my Prophet."

In recent days, we have seen lynching campaigns for two artists.

The lynching of Alanson works more on secularism than on the other. However, the main goal of those who walk to Bülent Ortaçgil is the probing and perception of reality.

What does Bulent Ortaçgil say about this point, which is a semi-political semi-psychological dimension? "When we look at the vote, do you think that 52% will not count, or the remaining 48% in the opposition? The president is elected with 52% of the vote, and the opposition has to accept that."

The basis of medieval democracy explained its principle. It is just that the result of the charge must be respected. But the main point here is to expose a perspective on the fund. In other words, he reminded us to go out of the polls to become a political power. This reminder contains an element that annoys tourists;

The argument of "the crest is not everything" has become a widely used argument over time since the AKP has won elections time and time again. But we saw the busiest time during the trip. According to them, the government should not be determined solely by polls. People should have the freedom to overthrow the government by going out on the streets, and they should be able to replace others instead of power. When the fund came out of their hands, they tried to market it as "Libertarian Democracy".

But they did not have much success either. I think democracy is the king's ship. A segment of the opposition, which we can call travelers, came from their hands to discredit this main thesis. When we returned to our language, we tried to say the result of the election, that respect for the will of the nation is the main paradigm of democracy. This speech has diminished with time. Because they were universally lonely. Although the "New York Times" are not all chests, like newspapers, the thesis Turkey analysis often publishes well in the end the hands of a weak argument, they could move to a place with seaweed .

The greatest force in the hands of the people drawn by the vote comes out in the election, namely the legitimacy of the ballot box

But I think the postponement of the opponents of the ballot box. stubbornness "I think that's not all". This is the sentence pattern that will be pre-empted at the first opportunity.

When they supported HDP as a Trojan horse in the June 7 elections, the AKP could not be the only leader. On the night of June 7, opponents clashed to praise polls. At that moment, they took a short break to make it insignificant. Because the result seemed to be what they wanted.

Yet, they have not given up yet.

At this point, I would like to convey to you a situation that I have encountered in the post-election debates I attended, because I believe that they will be able to overthrow Erdogan in the last elections of the second round and to believe deeply in this election and in the coffers. I observe that the opposition ceph tries to keep the argument "I think it is not everything" that they slowly put in the background in the market.

The reaction of Bülent Ortaçgil, whom they regard as their own neighborhoods, in the society where opponents are left in their neighborhoods, takes this argument out of their hands and weakens their hand in this regard.

Of course, the second dimension of the lincin that meets the Ortaçgil is of course psychological. A reality does not like the reminders of the opposition. He wanted to wake people alive in his imaginary world. Like Muharrem İnce, he invited opponents to reality. He told me to leave the world of imagination. He said that he should not act as if he had always won. A section of people hit their illness. Those who want to stay sick are mediocre.