[ad_1]
International Court of Arbitration (CAS) Judge and expert jurist Emin Özkurt said that the Italian team of UEFA had imposed a fine and a prospective warning on Milan on the grounds that he had violated the rules of financial fair play (Financial Fair Play).
Özkurt, who made a statement after the UEFA decision in Milan, "Galatasaray is in a much better position compared to Milan.When this decision and its motives are examined, it is almost impossible to ban UEFA." used expressions.
The UEFA European Cup away from the penalty for the Milanese, the SAW eliminated by recall, reminded Ozkurt the point reached at this stage by the UEFA Club Financial Control Unit ( CFCB) by the Italian team, stated the following:
"This decision on Milan has two dimensions: the first concerns sanctions to be strictly enforced, these are sanctions imposed by the Milan Club for violating the rules of the FFP and they are fined 12 millions of euros.This is the 2014-2019 season of the UEFA Europa League. " At the European competitions to be held in the years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, 21 players will be proposed instead of 25. Sanctions are also possible, if Milan does not respect the threshold of balance before June 30, 2021 , the next European competition. (2022-2023 and 2023-2024 years).
Özkurt also stated that Milan had the right to appeal to the CAS against this decision. "Milan has spent 200 million euros for the transfer of new players last year.The approximate debt of Milan is about 300 million euros." I gave information.
"Probability to arrive in Galatasaray almost to zero"
"If you take the relevant thread size with Turkey, on the basis of the debt amount of Milan's position and Galatasaray is in much better shape," speaking in the form of Ozkurt, said:
"Galatasaray's debt rose to around 130 million euros when the new deal was awarded to UEFA last June." According to the current level of debt in Milan, the possibility that the men were punished against Galatasaray was almost nil, because Galatasaray was similar to Milan.If CFCB takes a similar approach to similar incidents and behaves fairly, we can say that the book is closed for Galatasaray to be sanctioned.
The decision should be announced by the capitulation of Galatasaray
Özkurt about the timing of the announcement of the Milan decision, "It is no coincidence that the announcement of the verdict took place a day after the elimination of Milan from UEFA competitions." Apparently, UEFA has taken this decision not to affect Milan's motivation in the competition process, it is likely that he will wait for the end of this year's European adventure, as he is not subject to a deadline already relevant to the decision. from the CFCB. found in the evaluation.
In a written statement of October 5, the Galatasaray Club, as part of a written statement sent to UEFA by the Board of Research on the CFCB, decided to re-examine and continue the investigation . It was announced that the decision to re-examine the financial fair play agreement concluded with the Yellow-Reds and then revised.
Last June, in Milan, the UEFA Club Financial Control Commission (CFCB) was banned from European competition, and then appealed the decision to the CAS. Following its review of the CAS in July, the latter lifted the ban on European competitions against Milan and sent the case back to the CFCB for it to sanction the financial situation in a measured and sanctioned manner. from Milan.
SOURCE: a
Source link
