[ad_1]
The Constitutional Court has condemned the government, which has banned 14 strikes since 2002, to pay compensation of 50,000 Turkish liras
for violating the constitutionally guaranteed right to organize and discriminating against workers.
The Constitutional Court (AYM) Since the government banned 14 strikes, 50 thousand pounds have been punished for compensation. The ECJ concluded that the government had violated trade union rights guaranteed by the Constitution, banning strikes and making workers disadvantaged by employers. The United Steelworkers Union of DISK is sitting at the bargaining table with the MESS employers union to improve the rights of 15,000 workers in 38 workplaces operating in the automotive and metals sectors. 2015. The union decided to go on strike when no agreement was reached between the employer and the union. However, the Council of Ministers decided to postpone 60 days of strike because it would destroy national security. Thus, the strike became practically impracticable.
FUNNY COMPREHENSION
The union sued the State Council for arresting the executive. It was stated in the petition that if the strike is a disorder of national security, that the place, time and event are postponed and that the decision of the Council of Ministers based on the. arbitrary interpretation is not canceled, all strikes may be postponed with the same justification. However, the request was rejected. The union appealed to the State Council of the State Council. When the Council decides to refuse the accession of 8 to 7 members, this time the Constitutional Court has filed an individual application. The Constitutional Court, which dismissed the claim, sentenced the state to postpone the strike by paying 50,000 pounds of non-monetary compensation and legal rulings and interpretations against controversial decisions that prevented the government from enforcing trade union rights. .
WORKERS ARE DISABLED
"The decision to postpone the strike was made precisely during the collective agreement, leaving no choice but to go to the High Court of Arbitration The use of the right to strike and collective bargaining, which is a constitutional right, has become virtually insignificant, and workers clearly have not had the opportunity to strike. and to force employers to conclude a more favorable collective agreement.The justifications for reducing workers to a more disadvantageous position have not been demonstrated in court decisions. "" The decision of the Council of Ministers mentioned the Due to the postponement of the strike, and no further explanation was given.The trial court did not comment on the tangible evidence needed to postpone the strike.
AUGMENTA REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENTS
On the basis of the Constitutional Court's reasons, the Constitutional Court convinced the meaning of the terms (national security) in the legal clause that all strikes with economic consequences could lead to a consequence that would destroy national security and that constitutional rights could lead to unnecessary and insignificant interventions in a democratic society, saying: "With regard to the reasons for the postponement of the strike,
Should I do appeal to the directors?
In addition to compensation for non-pecuniary damage, He decided to reimburse the union for the trial of 7 pounds and the attorney's fees. One wonders if the Treasury, which will make the payment on behalf of the state, will reimburse this penalty to officials who sign the ban on strike.
[ad_2]
Source link
