[ad_1]
After the elections of June 24, the party that waters did not settle, the vote that he received as a candidate for the presidency and the explanation of the general assembly extraordinary of Meral Akşener who is under his party and the second time the search for measures against the "process of disintegration" is under discussion. The answer to the question of the political consequences of the departure of Akşener, which is political history, was decided to leave the general presidency on the basis of "emotional reaction", "tactical" according to some, and " of electoral failure "according to some.
Following the announcement of the "non-re-election to the presidency" of Akşener for the second time to the extraordinary Congress of the Good Party that will take place on August 12, the following questions are asked about the future sheet party road and the answers are:
Akşener's "resignation" exit to Afyon camp is also described as "not a candidate" after the extraordinary congress call, but he was described as "tactical" by the opposition parties and "rest" was interpreted as "However, those who knew Akşener well, emphasized his personality" stubborn "and resolute, and argued that he would not "come back." After Akşener's second appearance, the party argues that a group of administrators and members of the Akşener party should no longer "turn" and watch in front of the party The directors of Akşener shocked by the decision to resign were the decision Akşener to resign, while those who expressed this opinion expressed Akşener's decision to leave the party was "unsuccessful" and that the election results were "the party that he put in place with great difficulties, should not let go, otherwise the party will enter the "process of disintegration". A senior party official said, "We would not have been worried if Akşener 's decision to give up was a tactic, but that' s not the case. But we also understand his reaction.
GOOD PARTY DISTRIBUTED
In case Akşener is not convinced, the most frequently spoken part is the party. After the election, some MPs and party members are reminded of the "moderate and positive" messages to the AKP, and in the event of the beginning of the party 's dissolution process, some deputies may move to the polls. AKP and some can return to the MHP.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GOOD PARTY The AK Party's dismissal from the AK Party is a disconcerting IM
It's one of the most important questions to be answered in circles . Prior to the June 24 elections and after the alliance with the MHP AKP party, MHP leader Devlet Bahçeli and some of the party members' demands were disturbed by the long conversation that took place. Statements made by Bahçeli after the election, according to which he will undertake the task of "control of balance", are interpreted as a message of "I am eliminating" to the AKP in one direction. Behind the scenes, it is stated that the AKP party, which needs about 10 deputies for the majority in parliament, can keep the doors open for transfers of the right party to the MHP, which does not belong to the new government system. According to party sources, after Akşener's decision not to be a candidate, Bahçeli's appeal to "convince the lady" invites the AKP to transfer the acts of the right party to the assignee and to dismiss the party.
MERAL AKŞENER
Since the feast was founded, there are two names; Koray Aydin and Ümit Özdağ, from the "idealist" tradition, were presented as alternatives to Akşener. In fact, he was constantly talking about these names as they were going to start a "leadership" struggle in the party. Akşener, when the party was founded, "organization" gave the job to Aydın. It is stated that Aydın is active on organizations and delegates. Both names made the statement "Akşener, our only candidate" after Akşener's decision to leave, and gave the message that they will not enter a leadership contest for the moment. If Akşener is not "convinced" until the date of the congress, it is specified that these two candidates for the nomination will come on the agenda. However, it is stressed that the name "origin MHP" and the right-center people would be embarrassed to disrupt the "road separations" of the party. The "third option" that is expressed in Partide is the decision of Akşener to end the presidency for a period and to fix the administration of the "transition period" with the "third" name to ensure internal balance.
DYNAMIC RETURN MÜ?
Insists that in the absence of Akşener, he will be able to predict that the party will "drop" and go back to the party in order to avoid any distraction. In case Akşener would not come back to see all these things; It is pointed out that in the June 24 elections, the opposition will definitely disagree on the determination of the "roof candidate" and that "the nation's alliance" will provide justification for the allegations "d & # AKP Party agreement "Before the creation of the GOOD party, Akşener would have seen the chain of" intermediaries "with President Tayyip Erdoğan, but Akşener refuted these claims with precision. Those who know Akşener closely, even if the result of the dissolution of the party in this situation, the AKP Party, "Yarışacı fights" on the claims, They point out that Akşener does not conclude such an agreement with the & ş ş avec avec avec avec avec avec avec AKP. Some party leaders also expressed the opinion that if you do not go to the party, you will have to use trump to convince Akşener.
Source link
