[ad_1]
Respondent Nihat Doğan, who had the decision to call for forced intervention at the 60th Anatolian Criminal Court of First Instance, attended the meeting.
The accused Nihat Dogan, who defended his identity after working as a commentator on white television, said that he was working as a commentator on White TV and said, "Probably 15 days after the attempt July 15, in the media, the issue has already been examined and addressed until the end, and as a commentator, we asked some questions about our suspicions about White TV , and the questions we have already asked are those posed in the media "
Doğan said that he did not know the plaintiff Necati Şaşmaz and that he had no hostility towards him- same: "All the criticisms that I have made here were the action of the production company, after all, the Valley of the Wolves bought the production company. I have never said Necati Şaşmaz, FETÖ 'dir Necati Şaşmaz I have never said that I was a traitor .. It is impossible for me to accept a such thing .. Necati Şaşmaz is a friend of the artist that people are grateful and successful movies .. "[19659003
The court postponed the position for the elimination of deficiencies.
İDDIANAMEDEN
Anadolu Office of the Attorney General Necati Şaşmaz and Mehmet Canpolat are reminded that they have established a partnership with Pana Film, the producer of the repertoire entitled "Ambush of the Valley of the Wolves" , which has been on television for many years
in the program titled "I Can not Say I Can not," at the stage where some of the scenes from the 159th section published there are about 4 years have been interpreted as threats against the criminal acts against the president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, The Applicant made the comments of the "Kurtlar Vadisi Pulbe" by the July 15 coup attempt made by FETÖ, commenting on what they knew in advance and saying that they were insulted and defamed
In the indictment, the investigation was opened on the statements of Şaşmaz and Canpolat that the allegations were unfounded and concerned all the responsible persons, written statements of the administration of the relevant television channel, the defendants Nihat Doğan, Ömür Varol, Gülşah Saraçoğlu and Bircan İpek
In the indictment, the defendants demanded that They were punished with imprisonment of 1 year 9 months 15 days, 8 years 4 months, claiming that they had committed insult and defamation crimes on their behalf and demanded that 39, they are punished with imprisonment. being
[ad_2]
Source link
