Two former Trump advisers ordered to challenge the subpoenas in the House

The White House has ordered two former employees of President TrumpDonald John TrumpTed Cruz hits the New York Times for a "staggering" correction of the Kavanaugh report. A member of the US military service was killed in Afghanistan. The Pro-Trump website has changed the portrait of the British reality star to show it wearing the Trump PLUS hat to challenge their subpoenas to appear at a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday.

White House lawyer Pat Cipollone said in a letter to the panel that the Department of Justice had recommended and that Trump had ordered Rick Dearborn and Rob Porter to oppose their subpoenas. to appear for "constitutional immunity".

The letter told the two men not to go "because of the constitutional immunity that protects senior presidential advisers against the forced testimony of Congress and to protect the prerogatives of the presidency".

Democrats are legally opposed to the possibility of declaring "absolute immunity" in a lawsuit against former White House lawyer Don McGahn.

The only witness expected for Tuesday's hearing is now the former head of the Trump campaign. Corey LewandowskiCorey R. LewandowskiThe Hill & # 39; s 12:30 Report: The NY Times Story Raises a New Storm on Kavanaugh This week: the House is reviving its efforts to prevent the closure of production.. Cipollone asked Lewandowski, in another letter, not to divulge private conversations with the president beyond what is public with special counsel Robert MuellerRobert Cavan (Bob) Swan MuellerFox roasts Trump after criticizing the Mueller network: the report disappears from the political conversation Trump calls for the search for Obama's book deal MoreThe report, reported the Associated Press.

President of the Judiciary Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerThe word is important, except for the Democrats, when it is about dismissing Trump Nadler: the impeachment investigation is a "coined term", but it 's not the same. is essentially "what we do". The DOJ briefly argues against the dismissal investigation of the House. summoned the three to discuss what was reported by Mueller and to investigate whether Trump should be dismissed.

Nadler said in a statement Monday night that the White House's instructions constituted a "shocking and dangerous statement".

"The President would have us believe that he can deliberately engage in criminal activities and prevent witnesses from testifying before Congress – even if they do not work for him or for his administration," Nadler said. .