U crazy, brother? Steelers accused of racial bias

by



[ad_1]

43 minutes ago

In "U Mad, Bro?" This week, suggestions of racism are being held against the Steelers. Charges of moaning are exercised by Raiders fans. And we sent the best email I have ever read.

Let's start with this cart. For the record, he did not send me this tweet directly, but he deserves to be excoriated anyway.

The only negative comment on the structure that is happening here is that of Twitter. Because it gives a person in uniform, like this guy, a platform "hot" that goes against all truth.

Lowball? Look at the money that Kevin Colbert gave to people like Maurkice Pouncey and Stephon Tuitt.

Brown was the highest paid receiver of football when he signed his contract, and Bell would have been the highest paid half-rent if he had accepted the 2017 team's contract or the 2018 contract before the ### Extension of Todd Gurley.

None of this is to mention how the Steelers keep Ryan Shazier on the list even though he can not play, how they held off Ramon Foster when they could have let him walk, how they awarded Kordell Stewart the most big deal in his story and how they followed their own protocol Rooney Rule to hire Mike Tomlin.

Yeah. What a bunch of racist assholes.

I could not stop myself. I had to take a look at this title related to Sports Illustrated Raiders.

This Oakland fan called me for that.

Sour grapes?

Yeah. Probably. But what about Antonio Brown this week? He sent a tweet to complain about a job that he had asked.

Are these sour grapes from him?

And as far as being "salty", give me a break! No more salty than the wide receiver who made a tight pass because his quarterback made a critical comment about him in a radio show.

Bryan disagreed with my response to Emmanuel Sanders' story that Colbert did not respect him during contract negotiations in 2014 by comparing him to Brown.

Well, it depends. Do you really think this conversation went exactly as Sanders said?

For example, do you honestly believe he went into Colbert's office and said wisely, "Mr. Colbert, I can not sign this. But thanks for the offer. "

Then, Colbert answered bluntly: "You're not Antonio Brown!"

I'm going to assume that it was a lot less confrontational than that. I imagine it was rather, "Hey, Kevin. You gave $ 16 million in the last two years to A.B. So I want more than that out of three. "

And Colbert said, "Well, we give Antonio Brown more value."

So maybe … just maybe … Sanders recalls a different version of events for dramatic purposes.

Because it's practical. Because everyone takes hold of Colbert and the organization. Nobody did it in 2015. Everyone does it in 2019. So it's easy for Sanders to do it now.

In an email, Ed wanted to challenge with my recent articles about proposed changes to the NFL overtime and replay rules.

"Good article. But you're talking about a team scoring a goal, then the next team, a goal and then. Team A wins with a field placement. What happens if Team B goes for 2?

And the saints who groan about unjust sentences. Instead of complaining of the non-appeal, their defense might have had to stop the Rams from reaching the opposing goal."

Ed, on your second point, that's fine. But I would ask you if you had the same kind of reaction: "Let's get sucked and bargain" after the Steelers got caught in games with officials against the Saints and Chargers.

As for overtime, of course. A team can go for two. But when do you want to go for two? If you force the second team to get two after the first team has the choice to make one, the second team is still at a competitive disadvantage.

Like me, my new best friend, David, is furious with Sports Illustrated's Le'Veon Bell cover and Antonio Brown's interview on ESPN softball.

"The reading of Mr. Brown's screech blanket and Mr. Bell's follow-up distressed me. Mr. Brown seems disturbed and Mr. Bell seems to be involved in a painstaking effort to explain – to himself and to the world – why he is not an idiot.

Rather than exploring the story, context or subtext, your national media colleagues have chosen the path of least resistance: exchanging exclusive access to a brilliant name against a promise, probably implicit, to avoid questioning the stories concerned and deceived.

Which is to say that you have done a good job where others have failed. I hope your work attracts attention."

I have nothing to add here. This is the largest email in the history of the Internet. Unlike Ben Roethlisberger, I can simply invite David home.

Tim Benz is an editor of Tribune-Review. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be republished. All emails are subject to publication unless otherwise noted.


[ad_2]

Source link