[ad_1]
Space Force in 2018: Probably the most appropriate event to accompany the 60th anniversary of the creation of the National Agency of Aeronautics and Space (NASA). As part of its unilateral initiatives (but perhaps this time around this time), US President Donald Trump issued in mid-June 2018 a presidential directive to the Department of Defense to create space armed forces . He stressed that he should be independent and equal to the five known weapons of the US armed forces (infantry, naval, aviation, navy and electronics), noting that the electronic arm has become an independent force under the US military's mandate. former Democratic president Barack Obama.
Obama's persistent obsession with Obama's mandate and actions, but that does not mitigate the fact that he took a historic step in creating the the first American force dedicated to working in the cosmic space. What exactly does it mean? How can he be armed? In the early 21st century, NASA conducted an experiment involving an atomic explosion in an asteroid orbiting around a space known as the Kebor Belt. Does this mean that atomic weapons subject to restrictions and reductions on Earth will be spread over vast areas of cosmic space? Is not it a big risk? There are many signs of a significant lack of scientific knowledge about humans in space conditions. The twentieth century ended with the beginning of discovery by NASA scientists of dark matter and of his energy. Is it slowly accumulating in the 21st century Is not it an adventure to move weapons with high potential, in areas where humans do not know exactly what power and what interactions actually take place? And if corn weapons came close to a black hole?
As if suddenly or even inadvertently
Perhaps one of those concerns appeared in the commentary of the American astronomer Brian Wieden who observed that the Trumpet Declaration came in the part of the first meeting in his term of the National Council of Space "National Council of Space". According to Wadeen, who heads the Secure World Foundation, the purpose of the meeting is to announce the renewal of the Council's work. He also said that the stated program of the meeting was only to investigate the management of space transportation (such as those related to the proliferation of satellites and some of them reaching the end of service) rather than the establishment of global military forces. Ironically, US Secretary of Defense James Matisse said several days before the meeting that he was refusing to add weapons to the US armed forces, including space forces. He is supervised by the Pentagon, often operating in missile warning systems, directing ships, ground vehicles, air and communications of all types. This section is called "Space Management in the Air Force". It has approximately 36,000 executives in more than 130 locations worldwide. The branch pays particular attention to monitoring the activities of other countries in the atmosphere and space, particularly those that may affect US military operations.
On the other hand, the US Space News website reported that Trump's decision was fully justified. Indeed, the Pentagon's 2018 budget included an article on creating a "space corps" Which meant that Trump's decision was not a lightning bolt that suddenly came out of a clear sky. Also in 2017 was launched an initiative on the establishment of cosmic forces, co-written by Rep. Mike Rogers (Republican, Alabama) and Jim Cooper (Democrat, Tennessee), which means it could go beyond the bipartisan fracture. At the time, the two MPs justified their initiative by pointing out that Russia and China had superior space military capabilities to US military forces that carried out similar missions, which required the creation of an independent military force. specialized in space
. The founding president of US space forces after his defense secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, convinced him. At the time, the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 prevented the continuation of this step.
Mars is a rival but …
Perhaps the longest eclipse of the 21st century, so the "Bloody Moon" accompanied by a bright orange color of Mars. NASA for many reasons. The agency was born at the time to compete with the Soviet Union at the time for access to the moon, one of the strongest relations of the Cold war between the Soviet and American giants of the 20th century
. Surpassed the Soviets by delivering the first human to walk on the moon. Some consider this scientific and practical excellence as the beginning of America's victory in the Cold War over the Soviet communist giant.
Whether it is true or not, access to the moon is a bright spot in NASA's record, now. Manned and unmanned flights continued to sink in the moon, but his dark face never saw the land.
The moon missed the introduction of NASA under the reign of Democratic President Bill Clinton, and replaced Mars with an alternative to space. From that. America preceded the world in the delivery and exploration of robotic vehicles on Mars.
The 60th Anniversary of NASA coincides with the announcement by the European Space Agency (ESA) of the discovery of the first underground aquifer near the North Pole of Mars,
The conjunction of the lunar eclipse and the brilliance of Mars is an important issue that has emerged in the context of the adventure of man's discovery by man, but has become essentially (but relatively) in the Strategy goals by exploring the universe. This is in conflict with a known figure of 5.5 billion years! Yes it's a well-known figure, but it's also scary. These years separate humans from the moment of the collapse of the solar system, after the space furnace drains its abilities. This means that humans must seek to discover planets that are suitable for human habitation, or perhaps to transfer a large number. Do they move all or not? How are things then?
Source link
