[ad_1]
The media focused more on the themes of harassment and its stories, but not to have any illusions about the role of the majority of Arab and international media, let us note the starting point and the causes.
Last October, knowing that before that was a name or a campaign, it was It began in 2006 actively hip the African activist assets American Tarana Brooke, that she had been sexually assaulted.
If, me too, I was not born in the near future, she was a media journalist who did not have the excitement elements, at the moment when the actress Elisa Milano used The phrase "I Also" to support her friend, actress Rose McGuin, when she accused Harvey Winston, one of Hollywood 's most influential filmmakers, of l'. mugged. It is there that began the carnival of the media.
With the completion of the excitement elements, actresses and big names, courts and scandals, the elements of media hypocrisy are also complete. This movement was not famous, it was not famous, it was not famous, of African descent, it is not beautiful in the stereotypical sense of beauty his story and the stories of his wives are related to ordinary people. "His story is biased." Even when Tarana was imposed on the media after spreading the label "I am also" around the world, it was not allowed to appear as it is, for example, when She is honored by the "old" magazine "Time". (19459003) Read More
Not the first time the media needed a brilliant name to deal with a tragedy or a real problem: Darfur needed it, but it was not the first time. George Clooney to be in the titles. Refugee camps Angelina Jolie needed pictures of the miserable children of the camps
Tirana was aware of the broad hypocrisy and expressed her concern that the movement was deviating from its original purpose and hoped that all this support would go towards what 39, she called "real action". But also pragmatism says vague, especially when you meet a general goal, and that's what it's done, and maybe that's what we should do and appreciate that subjects harassment are ultimately reserved for the media, in the hope that the commitment is aware. The application is still superficial and even in some cases
We take the example of the World Cup and the media coverage. It is true that the titles used to describe the harassment or harassment were numerous, and it is good that the act is clearly defined, but the conscience remains limited to other means, some of which are described as " kiss "like the Russian Sputnik in a yellow title" From an encouraging fan to a sports reporter), given the composition of the title, only the editor of Sputnik and the most important sequence is the video and the second, and it's a desperate attempt to attract attention. "This kind of yellow address is not just the responsibility of a publisher who evaluates his work with the ### 39, index of readings or observations, but it is a shared responsibility with the addressee who avoids the truth, but he listens to the scandal.
Also read
No need to. a study supported by numbers, in a survey visit on the subject s most read in Arab sites, yellow headlines that contain sexual references any other topic, the desire of the Arab public to know the stories of harassment and scandals. The harassment and its motivations and the real work comes in the background of the news and in the context of interest. Another area is mixed responsibilities between the media and the recipient, and shows the subconscious of both sides harassment harassment is the act of sexual type is not allowed or agreed between the parties, These acts are broad, ranging from simple violations to severe harassment, ranging from insinuation to action.
As a result, Egyptian TV journalist Fathallah Zaidan was harassed when a Russian kiss was taken on him. But the headlines of the Arab media, in a brutal and direct manner, were exposed to the incident as "a Russian beauty accepting an Egyptian television journalist" or "a Russian fanatic denigrating the Egyptian journalist". It is in the spirit of these headlines that the Arab male comments congratulate the reporter on his "good luck". Did any one ask if the reporter was happy about what happened? Did he get his consent? Does his lifestyle match? Is harassment limited to women? In the same direction, Diego Maradona, the game legend of Argentina in Nigeria and Argentina, came under the definition of harassment when he directed the Nigerian public an "imperfect" movement with a sexual connotation. The media did not ignore the shot, but the news was either about Maradona's girlfriend, who was attending the match, or about the state of health that had collapsed, the recipient on Sucral Media took the joke with Maradona and some considered it a spherical myth or thief. World Cup 1986.
Is the legend of Maradona football enough to allow it to harass an entire audience? Did not the Maradona football legend end when he was defeated by the Khorfakkan team and led by the Al-Fujairah club in exchange for millions of first-rounders? Is the myth enough to allow anyone to harass an individual or an audience? Or do we need Elissa Milano to talk about harassing Maradona and discover how much a man and a football legend are an example?
News | News of the day: Harassment and harassment and Maradona – You can see the source of the original news of the following link: The new Arab and the site of the unit declines any responsibility for the content of any news, but the responsibility lies with the Original publisher of the news.
Source link