Poor enforcement of public health law slowly kills non-smokers



[ad_1]

Is it possible to sue a woman in our country because she gave birth to a deformed child or caused the sudden death of her son after being subjected to smoking?

It will certainly be a fantasy, because it is a hypothetical question that leads to an issue that the courts may not be able to examine even if they exist in our reality.

Many mothers practice the damage to embryos to varying degrees due to continued smoking, which is not alleged, but is based on scientific evidence proven by dozens of specialized studies that indicate that smoking during month of pregnancy has significant negative effects and that the mother of the smoker has predicted a malformation of the fetus and congenital or cancerous abnormalities. Sudden or sudden death, or post-delivery exposure to breathing problems, asthma and bronchitis.

The harms caused by the mother to her child or by her father to her children in old age and the deprivation of their grandchildren from a safe living environment away from the impact of secondhand smoke, a clear confirmation that tobacco dependence can overcome feelings of motherhood and paternity in many people.

Perhaps the most serious thing in the case of the mistreatment of the mothers and fathers of their children, whether embryos, breasts or students who smoke at home, that there is no law protects those innocent from the consequences of second-hand smoke, and that it may be impossible to have a law in the future to prevent parents from smoking, that the class does not have the ability to protest and that the baby does not have to tell his parents: "You hurt me to smoke you."

Although most smokers do not hesitate to smoke indoors and outdoors, some health facilities such as the KHCC have the ambition to reduce the phenomenon that undermines health and the wealth of Jordanians, as confirmed by the statistics of the Jordanian household. Cigarettes came in second with 558 dinars, or 7.6 percent of total annual expenditures, while health care expenditures in Jordan dropped to 3.6 percent.

The goal of the fight against passive smoking among non-smokers is based on real reasons and important motives: smoking costs hundreds of lives each year and 61 Jordanians die every week. Jordan's death rate was by 12%, according to a recent survey conducted by the Department of Statistics.

The spread of smoking in private places such as homes and tribal halls can be difficult to control given the weakness of many smokers to feel socially responsible, but the spread in public places only reflects the poor control of Government and the abandonment of the application of the law on public health and indifference to smoking, More than double the damage caused to smokers.

Smokers will continue to hate them until official authorities, including the Ministry of Health, ignore the law and apply a policy of turning a blind eye to smoking in hospitals, courts, universities, schools, courts, security centers and other public places.

The fact is that there is a formal delay in the application of the Public Health Act despite the appearance of the phenomenon and a poor application that has no ambition, indicating that the Ministry has only done 755 inspections, giving rise to 188 violations and 475 warnings only since the beginning of the year. Like prison, for example, although the law states that it can be applied as a sanction in accordance with its 2017 amendments.

Those who believe that corporations are right in passing laws are bad, because strict laws can only deter them completely if they rely on community cultural levers to which people are attached. It is therefore imperative to continue awareness campaigns on the effects of passive smoking and passive smoking.

The bottom line is that this is an enlightening legal battle, led by the institutions concerned with the health of the individual, which aims to raise public awareness of health problems in the area. others and that the official authorities ensure that all judicial measures taken against violators of the law on public health.

[email protected]

[ad_2]
Source link