[ad_1]
Welcome to the return of the Sunday morning quarterback with a special edition of Friday. As the post-game recap title reads, I think most Bruin fans have regained Bruin's feeling after last night's game.
This is largely due to the fact that the starting quarterback of the UCLA Bruins was no different on the pitch last night compared to last season. To be sure, it started very well. He completed three of his first four assists in the game. Unfortunately for the Bruin fans, it was essentially his strong offensive moments for the night. In fairness, he managed two touchdown passes after that, but Demetric Felton was really responsible for his touchdown reception, as he caught the ball coming out of the backfield, before heading into the Cincinnati defense to get the first touchdown. UCLA score.
I already imagine how people wearing Rose Bowl color glasses will defend it.
"He did not have his best running back nor the receiver or …."
Puh-leeze.
Given the way he was throwing the ball, it did not matter. In fact, he could have stood on the beach with a beach ball and he could not have gone after the ocean. Worse, if it was a Californian beach, he could have stood on the beach and thrown it directly to Hawaii, where a Cincinnati half-defender standing in Waikiki would catch her up and bring her back almost California. Meanwhile, his intended receiver was actually on Catalina Beach.
Some may want to argue that he has "had a bad match". And you could probably get by too, if he was not for all the "bad games" he had last season.
But in the end, the chip stops there. Yes it is true. In the end, Chip Kelly is the ultimate leader of the team's performance on the field. Last night's performances, like the first six games of last season, were terribly awful.
Once, I'd like to see Chip Kelly withdraw his starting quarterback because he's playing a terrible match.
Even so, almost two years after Kelly was hired, it seems to be just a question of how much the UCLA football program is a meritocracy and the players who deserved it will be the ones who play, really seems to be an asterisk next to Kelly's statements on the program as a meritocracy * (* means the word is used to refer to all defending positions and all offensive positions, with the exception of the quarterback.)
Because that's how I read it.
Why? Because at some point a coach has to watch how his player reacts to the gaming situations and, until now, there is absolutely no evidence to indicate that Dorian Thompson-Robinson reacts well to these situations in the game. In fact, the preponderance of the evidence suggests that he reacts extremely badly to adverse situations in the game.
Last season, the fans have consistently seen themselves behaving like a deer in the lighthouses. That same look seemed to come back last night. and
The only questions left are: why does not Chip Kelly see it too? Why is Chip so stubborn that he will not put another quarter?
It's time for him to try something different. It is time for him to put Dorian Thompson – Robinson on the bench and give someone else the opportunity to introduce themselves. After all, what is the point of a meritocracy * if a player earns play time in practice and, as a result, consistently fails to show why he has won play time when it comes to performance at stake?
Go Bruins.
[ad_2]
Source link