& # 39; & # 39; We are going to go and attack the mother – ker & # 39;

T Thursday ushered in a new Congress, Democrats not only took over Parliament, but they also began talking about President Trump's removal.

Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., A new legislator, told participants at an event organized by the progressive organization MoveOn that she was determined to remove Trump from the oval office.

She paraphrased a conversation she had with her son.

"Look mom, you won. Bullies do not win, "she said.

" You're right, they do not. And we will go there and dismiss the asshole, "said Tlaib, one of the first two Muslim women elected to Congress.

Tlaib and John Bonifaz, the lawyer who launched the "Impeach Donald Trump Now" campaign, published an editorial in the Detroit Free Press on Thursday, in which he described Trump as " direct and serious threat ". America.

"He almost daily attacks our Constitution, our democracy, the rule of law and the people of this country.His behavior has created a constitutional crisis that we must face now," the editorial said. .

They said that Trump should be indicted for a long list of offenses, including "obstruction of justice, violation of the emoluments clause, abuse of the power to pardon, order or order the forces of the Order to sue political opponents for illegitimate purposes; and undermine equal protection of laws, order the cruel and unconstitutional imprisonment of children and their families on the southern border, and conspire to illegally influence the election of 2016 through a series of hidden cash payments. "

While other lawmakers, including Democrats, have asked the special advocate Robert Mueller to conclude his investigation of the Trump campaign and the transitional team, Tlaib and Bonifaz said that the time had come to strike.

"Those who say that we have to wait for Special Adviser Mueller to complete his criminal investigation before Congress can begin an impeachment proceeding do not take into account this crucial distinction," they write. "There is absolutely no need for a president to be charged or convicted of a crime before Congress can dismiss him." They also ignore the fact that a large number of offenses impossible to perpetrate committed by this president are beyond the scope of the investigation of the special advocate. "