[ad_1]
In this file photo of May 10, 2013, Cody Wilson holds what he calls a "Liberator" pistol that was completely fabricated on a 3D printer at his home in Austin. Eight states filed a lawsuit Monday against the Trump administration for its decision to allow a Texas company to publish downloadable plans for such weapons, saying that hard-to-trace plastic weapons are a boon for terrorists and terrorists. criminals. (Jay Janner / Austin American-American by AP, File)
A federal judge blocked the public availability of plans that provide instructions for making guns using 3D printers, a few hours before the documents were supposed to be released in line.
US District Court Judge Robert Lasnik granted a temporary restraining order Tuesday night, unless downloadable information about the creation of DIY weapons.
Eight attorneys general and the District of Columbia argued that the instructions threatened. New York Governor Andrew M. Cuomo (D) also issued a cease and desist order against the man who was to put them online.
"In a major victory for common sense and public safety, a federal government judge has just granted our request for a temporary ban order at the national level – preventing the Trump administration from authorizing the distribution of material to 3D firearms easily, "said New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood in a statement." As we have argued in the the lawsuit we filed yesterday, it is – quite simply – crazy to give criminals the tools to make undetectable and undetectable printed guns at the touch of a button. Yet that is exactly what the Trump administration has decided to allow. "
Josh Blackman, a lawyer who represents Cody Wilson, the founder of the non-profit organization, said the restraining order violates the protected rights of the First Amendment." We were disappointed by the decision and considered it a massive prior restraint of freedom of expression, "said Blackman.
[Lawmakers are trying to prevent the spread of 3-D-printed guns. They may be too late.]
Legislative and legal maneuvers aimed to prevent Defense Distributed, a nonprofit organization in Texas , to publish the 3-D- firearms printed on the internet.The firearms, which are mostly made of plastic, can not be traced because they do not have a number of series, do not require background checks for printing and are easily destroyed after use.The available plans include guides to make weapons similar to assault rifles like the AR-15 and AR -10, a pistol called "Liberator" and a Ruger 10/22.
Technology could herald an era of DIY guns that can be produced – and amassed – in secret.
The Pennsylvania Attorney General also sued Distributed Defense Sunday, and the company agreed to temporarily block Pennsylvania users from its website. Democrats in the House and Senate have also introduced legislation that would ban firearms built from 3D printed material.
But despite the efforts, some plans were posted online Friday, according to Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro. He said that about 1,000 people had already downloaded in a few days 3D plans for AR-15 semi-automatic rifles. Defense Distributed has agreed not to download new files.
In a tweet, President Trump said that weapons "do not seem to make much sense." Trump said he "examined" the available weapons and said that he was talking with the National Rifle Association
Deputy White House Press Secretary Hogan Gidley told reporters Tuesday that it was illegal to own or manufacture a "pistol" plastic of any kind ', including on a 3D printer. Gidley said that the administration supports the law and that she "will continue to look at all the options that we offer to do what is necessary to protect Americans while supporting the first and second Amendments … The President is committed to the safety and security of all Americans and considers it to be his highest responsibility. "
Chris Cox, Executive Director of the United States. Institute for Legislative Action of the NRA, said in a statement that -D printing will lead to production and the "generalized proliferation" of plastic weapons, undetectable.
"Regardless of what a person may be able to publish on the Internet, undetectable plastic weapons have been illegal for 30 years," Cox said. , noting that the federal law makes it illegal to manufacture, import, sell, ship, deliver, possess, transfer or receive an undetectable firearm.
It is legal to make a firearm for personal use without a license, a tax payment and the prior approval of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Medical Devices. explosives. It is also illegal to make a firearm from 10 or more imported parts, and it is illegal to make weapons that can not be detected by metal detectors or X-ray machines.
Wilson, the Founder of Defense Distributed, manufactured the first 3D printed gun and posted the design files online. The federal government alleged that the federal law was violating. According to him, the downloading of the files amounted to an illegal export of firearms
[Meet the man who might have brought on the age of ‘downloadable guns’]
Wilson brought a lawsuit, and the federal government shocked all stakeholders by reversing his position. He settled with Wilson on June 29, agreeing to pay $ 40,000 in legal fees and exempting the company from regulation, which allows him to post plans online. His lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday night's decision.
Twenty-one Attorneys General signed a letter requesting State Secretary Mike Pompeo and Attorney General Jeff Sessions to withdraw from the settlement
State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert , said that US citizens were legally able to download the files for years and that the State Department was involved because it controlled access to US defense technology. the case, claiming that the government's attempts to block the publication of information on the Web amounted to a prior restriction prohibited by Supreme Court jurisprudence. Wilson 's lawyer, Josh Blackman, compared the government' s attempts to block his client 's website to the Pentagon Papers case, in which the Nixon administration attempted unsuccessfully. prevent the New York Times and the Washington Post from publishing the report.
Nauert stated that the Department of Justice recommended that the case be settled because it would probably be lost for the first amendment.
Wilson has filed a lawsuit against the New Jersey Attorney General and the Los Angeles City Attorney in recent days. about "access to information", not firearms regulations.
A group of gun control groups brought an action to prevent the publication of the diagrams;
Opponents blame the Trump administration for allowing them to go online.
". @ POTUS has endangered the lives of countless innocent children, teachers, religious faithful, music lovers, not to mention passers-by. "These unavoidable deaths will be on his hands," said Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.), who was shot five times in the Jonestown Massacre in 1978.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Me.) Said that she believes that Congress must act on firearms.
"This is a dangerous development and the idea of allowing terrorists and criminals to manufacture their own firearms using 3D printers is very
Read more:
" Building the Wall, "Florida governor candidate tells his girl in the countryside
A Midwest chain told the Hawaiians to stop using" Aloha "with & # 39; "Poke" ignite a heated debate
The irresponsible reaction of the man who shared the video of a worm in his food
[ad_2]
Source link
