[ad_1]
Legal
The Department of Justice prepares an unusual appeal to prevent the governments of Canada from State of Maryland and District of Columbia to stop resorting to federal action to seek access to information indicating whether President Donald Trump is using his Washington luxury hotel to make an unconstitutional profit from his office. [19659007] Last month, US District Court Judge Peter Messitte denied Trump's application for leave, and federal government lawyers say they plan to appeal anyway, using a process rarely invoked that can prevent a lost judge from continuing his course.
Written continuation below
On Friday, the Department of Justice informed Messitte that the federal government was considering trying to obtain the Richmond Circuit Court
"The Solicitor US General authorized the filing in US Court of Appeals of the Fourth Circuit of an application for an order of mandamus against the orders of that court refusing to dismiss the case certify an interlocutory appeal, as well as a request for a stay of proceedings in a district court pending the resolution of the application for mandamus, "wrote lawyers for the Department of Justice.
Maryland and Washington, DC lawyers, asked the judge to open a month of discovery of the file, during which they could collect the depositions of witnesses, request archives and issue written questions focused on how the cases of Hotel Trump International Benefit from Election to the Presidency
Attorneys General of DC and Maryland said they could request a "limited discovery" directly to Trump, but that they would first try other sources of information.
The complaint, filed in June, alleges. that Trump violates two "emoluments" clauses of the Constitution by using his hotel located on Pennsylvania Avenue to reap financial dividends from his presidency. A provision covers business with foreign governments. The other prohibits federal officials from taking advantage of financial relationships with individual states.
The Trump organization pledged to donate to the US Treasury all profits from the hotel business with foreign governments. However, the way these amounts are calculated is not very transparent.
In his ruling last month, denying Trump leave to appeal, Mr. Messitte also noted that while Trump's attorneys in the emoluments case were complaining the fact that a dispute would be a distraction. For the president, the president regularly threatens to sue those who damage him.
"It should be noted that the president himself seems to have hardly hesitated to engage in personal pursuits despite the supposed distractions that he imposes on his office," the judge writes.
Earlier this year, Messitte – appointed by President Bill Clinton – issued a notice refuting the arguments of DOJ lawyers that Maryland and DC did not have the legal capacity to prosecute the case. question of emoluments against Trump. The judge also rejected the arguments of Trump's lawyers that the definition of emoluments contained in the Constitution only includes direct payment for official services and excludes all private commercial transactions.
Messitte, who sits in the Greenbelt, had indicated that he was planning to issue an opening discovery order in the case Monday. Without an intervention of 4 e circuit, the first exchange of information should take place within a week.
A similar lawsuit against Trump by Democratic lawmakers raised a first hurdle in federal court in Washington. , while a pair of lawsuits filed in New York were dismissed by a judge. This decision is on appeal.
Source link
