[ad_1]
"It was necessary to play at home" Goffenheim "or at the exit of" Lyon ", leading 2-0 in the account, to take advantage and take three points" – you can stir your fists after the fight, but there is a risk of becoming & # 39; an act of ridicule.
For the same success with which we want to talk about victories in matches that Shakhtar reduced to a draw, we can talk about defeats. Did the citizens of Donetsk not stay with a "bag" in the first match of the group, while "Hoffe" was in Kharkiv? Or could they not lose not only a victory, but also a draw in the field of "Lyon" in the match of the second round? Let everyone answer these questions honestly, then automatically lose the desire to deplore the final result of this group.
Everything could end worse. And could it be better? This would have been the case if Lyon had not missed a sensation on Manchester City. But that's the justice tribute: it would be fun for the team that burned its favorite teams to 0: 9 to finish higher than the one that scored four points with Mancity.
The two teams did not show anything exceptional. Apparently, in such a terrain and at such a price, the mistake of expecting another football was naive, although Shakhtar could play better in midfield. We do not even talk about the protection that, in this Champions League, has always been the weakest player of the "minors". At the crucial moment, the Shakhtar is crushed against the central axis.
Maicon became the fourth best Shakhtar player on the basis of the TTD. If you believe in statistics, only Marloss, Pyatov and Ismailis have done more useful things. But such a score, Maicon first got a successful match in the pass. Relatively good. From the 51st transmission – 46 accurate. Most of them (38) were made in the direction of the goal of the opponent. Certainly, these transfers hardly concealed the danger for Lyon and did not help the Shakhtar to leave half of their workforce quickly. In the end, it was the incompleteness of Maicon that allowed Nabil Fekir to more easily take the doors of Pyatov.
A Maicon pass game; the majority of transfers – forward, but it did not lighten the life of Shakhtar
Stepanenko also succeeds in passing the pass (according to statistics – even better than Maicon), but Taras failed in others components of the match. For example, only one good ball selection, no interception, only one took the ball. With the fact that Taras is often found almost on the same line as the central defenders.
By the way, that's a question – why? Why did Stepanenko lose the area of support, falling under the control of the defense, where should Khocholava and Krivtsov act closely? David played only once, but showed great intensity and attachment to his position. Matvienko did not lose the surface, but Butko always turned to the back. Bogdan is still in another half of the field and has not had time to come back. It was clear that this was the idea of the coach, because Ismaili was working the same way on the opposite side. The difference is that the Brazilian worked productively along the length of the flank.
Maicon was more moved to the right eagle and a void was occurring in the center. And here is the favorite character of the great army of Shakhtar fans, Victor Kovalenko. In previous games, Victor had shown signs of recovery, but this time, the intensity of his actions was again extremely low: no strike at the door, no attempt at dribbling, no handing over. key. Where to go: from Kovalenko, happiness was simply waiting for the transfer. 23 passes (17 accurate) – depressing result for the player in the area under the attacker. 30 touchdowns on the ball, of which only one is in the opponent's penalty area (and this one in the episode when Victor completely loses the fight of his opponent). It may have been worthwhile to move Tyson to the center and let the left flank entrust to someone else.
The intensity of Kovalenko's action … extremely low
In fact, Tyson often moved to the center, opening the area to Ismail. It is the reception that has most harassed the French and which, according to the coach of the "weavers", feared the most … More Zhenziuu scored Marlossa, although the Brazilian-Ukrainian did not not played his strongest match. the difference compared to the match in Lyon, which has not done more than expected. In France, the journalist scored a double, scoring one of the goals solely on individual skill and courage. This time, Morais had just done what he was supposed to do: he had launched a spider-like attack like a Shakhtar with a perfect shot
It should be noted that in this case General, Shakhtar's game was directed towards the goal of Lyon. The transmissions were most often carried out in or near their own free field, when the "miners" were trying to extricate themselves from the pressure exerted on their opponents. Another problem in this game was the lack of shots on goal. Only six attempts scored to score a goal – very little like a team that needs a win for the postseason release. It should also be noted that no strike has taken place outside the penalty area. And in such a time, this item could become a major asset in the game.
Shockbox (Orange) and Lyonnaise (blue) strikes
This Champions League has given many reasons for reflection. The theses can be described as follows:
- Andriy Pyatov, despite all his shortcomings, remains the supreme guardian and plays an important role for Shakhtar;
- The present Shakhtar depends to the extent possible on the game of its leaders, Marloss and Tyson;
- The defense of "minors" has never impressed Lucescu's reliability; but with Fonseca, the defense business goes even worse;
- Junior Morais is an attacker perfectly adapted to Shakhtar;
- The loss of Fred is irreparable;
- Ismaili is the head of Shakhtar at the level of Tyson and Marlose;
- Matvienko is the future of the team;
- Paul Fonseca – The coach is progressive but depends on improvised material.
And in the spring, the League of Europe, and with it – new conclusions.
[ad_2]
Source link
