[ad_1]
In an interview Sunday at "Fox & Friends," President Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, said the Democrats had rejected a law that would have "absolutely prevented" the murder of California policeman Ronil Singh by an illegal immigrant Wednesday morning.
The suspect, Gustavo Perez Arriaga, had gang affiliations and two previous DUI arrests. Last weekend, Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson said the murder "could have been avoided," saying California law had prevented the authorities from sharing information about the arrests with DUI. Arriaga with Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
"This could have been prevented by just a reasonably reasonable policy," said Giuliani. "The Democrats … voted against laws that would have absolutely prevented this by putting the spotlight on gang members." It should have been taken for drunken driving behavior … Special legislation targeted members Most Democrats Nearly all Republicans voted in. If this law had been passed, this murder might not have happened. "
In September 2017, the law on the death penalty was passed. the removal of gang members from gangsters in criminal groups, which would have given authorities the opportunity to take action against alleged gang members even though they were not convicted of a crime, they adopted party rules in the House, but were not further examined by the Senate.
Giuliani added that "this will continue", and emphasized the Democrats' previous support for strengthening the financing of the border wall.
"This thing about a wall is totally crazy – they all voted for it," Giuliani said. "She [House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi] was in favor of that, now she says it's immoral, so I hope she's going to confess, I mean, she's Catholic."
Separately, Giuliani questioned the official explanation of the special advocate Robert Mueller as to why the phones of two of his former top assistants were completely wiped out just days after being fired for their anti-Trump bias. Giuliani also reiterated his previous assertions that Trump would not sit for an individual interview with Mueller, citing what he called the "immoral behavior or blatant negligence" of prosecutors. Special advocate.
In a comprehensive report released last month, the Ministry of Justice's internal guard service blamed a technical problem on a series of missing text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, former FBI anti-Trump officers, and revealed that the government phones issued by the office of the special advocate Robert Mueller to Strzok and Page
Strzok – who, in August 2016, had sent a text to Page on an "insurance policy" in the case where Trump would win the elections and have secretly discussed a "media leak strategy" regarding the investigation of Russia – was removed from the Mueller team at the end of July 2017, after the FBI discovered that he was sending anti-Trump text messages. He sent many of these messages to Page, with whom he was engaged in an extramarital affair.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE APP FOX NEWS
"All these texts from Strzok and Page – deleted?" Giulani asked. "After discovering that Strzok was sending a text saying that he hated Trump, he would look for him and stop him – and that he could not stop him, he had a" police d & rsquo; "Insurance" to get him out of office I believe that Mueller is the insurance policy that will help him remove him from office, I do not just say that: Strzok was his first investigator. "[19659003] MUELLER RECORDS OFFICER ACKNOWLEDGED TO THE TELEPHONE ALL TELEPHONE, CAN NOT RECALL. TEXT MESSAGES ON IT
The Inspector General (IG) of the DOJ said that with the help of the Ministry of Defense, he was able to uncover thousands of missing text messages written by Strzok and Page and sent with the help of their messages issued by the FBI. Samsung phones from December 15, 2016 to May 17, 2017, "as well as hundreds of other text messages outside of the interval period that the FBI had not produced due to technical issues related to its tool for collecting text messages. " [19659003] But when the IG looked for separately published iPhones at Strzok and Page by the investigators told Mueller's team that "[Strzok’s] the iPhone had been reset to the settings of the iPhone." factory and had been reconfigured for the new user to whom the device was assigned. "
The agent of the special attorney's archives told the IG that "as part of the procedure of keeping records of the office, the officer has examined the l & # 39; IPhone issued by the Justice Ministry of Strzok "on September 6, 2017" and "determined that it contained no text message" before it was completely erased – just weeks after the Strzok's dismissal from Mueller's team – Anti-Trump Bias and anti-Trump SMS sending.
"STRATEGY INSIDE STRZOK AND PAGE" AT FBI [19659003] "The person who determined what was to be eliminated was the officer in charge of the Mueller archives, said there was nothing of interest there," Giulani said. "It's hard to believe that Strzok and Page have suddenly decided," We will not be sending out any more text messages about Donald Trump. "They seemed to chat obsessively and compulsively about it. I do not know what kind of lover they were talking about all the time. It's ridiculous. "
Giuliani did not dispute the FBI's assertion that a technical problem had occurred.
" As far as I know, I hope that it's not a problem. there will be a way to reproduce, "said Giuliani." The texts only last … for a bit … not like emails. I do this job, cybersecurity work. The texts are difficult to obtain. That's right. "
Giuliani added that it was perhaps more likely that Strzok, in fact explosive court documents released earlier this month revealed that in January 2017 FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe urged Flynn not to call a lawyer during the interrogation which eventually led to his guilty plea for one lie to the federal authorities. [19659003] "It might be very embarrassing to say the same things while working for the special advocate" more special than you ". – "We coach Flynn, we will not tell him that he has the right to appeal to counsel," Giuliani said.
To the question of whether he expects Mueller's final investigation report to be published in February, Giulani suggested not to do so. Do not hold your breath. [19659003] HOW THE FBI SUGGESTED SUGGESTED AT A FISA TRIBUNAL TO HAVE MORE PROOF THAT IT DID NOT TRUMP MONITOR HELP
Journalists watch Russian President Vladimir Putin deliver his annual speech on the l. State of the Nation in Manezh, Moscow (Russia), March 1, 2018. (AP Photo / Alexander Zemlianichenko)
"Oh God, almighty – he started out in March, then in May – we are now in the fourth degree of separation from the non-crime of collusion," said Giulani. "We went to the non-crime of obstruction of justice, it did not work for them.Then he passed to the campaign contributions, which by the way are not in violation of the law on campaign funding, and now they are looking at the Russian tower, they should go to Moscow, there is no tower, it was not built, it does not go beyond of a non-binding letter of intent, which is a wish. "
Giuliani maintained that Trump was" as surprised as I was "about WikiLeaks' revelations of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) during the 2016 presidential campaign, and pointed out that the underlying emails were not falsified.
is that the emails revealed that his campaign had received illicit internal information from the DNC to help him get the nomination.
"What really seduced Hillary is not her revelation, but her veracity – she really cheated on the debates, she really wa Before answering Donna Brazile's questions, she really screwed up in # Bernie Sanders – all was true. "
He added a personal message to Mueller:" My ultimatum is "firm or firm, Bob." I mean, what do you have? There are those who believe that you have nothing in collusion, and, by the way, even if you did not commit this crime, what are you doing then? Do you have anything to show that the President of the United States was involved in a plot to hack the DNC with Russia? Of course not, if you do, publish a report or give it to the Justice Department, let it check, make sure it does not is not classified or anything, publish a report, we are ready to disprove it, the report is ready for two months. "
Source link
