[ad_1]
The Texas federal judge, who ruled this month that the Affordable Care Act was invalid, suspended the case on Sunday, which means the law will remain in effect as long as the decision is made on appeal.
Judge Reed O'Connor, of the Federal District Court in Fort Worth, said the decision should not come into effect immediately "as many ordinary Americans would face great uncertainty" when 39, a call.
The decision opened the door to an appeal. by California and 15 other states that support the law on health care.
The original decision of Judge O. Connor caused confusion, as many states terminated their registration for 2019. Even though he had stated that the individual mandate of the law was unconstitutional. and that the rest of the law was therefore invalid, he did not issue an injunction preventing the execution of the law.
The Affordable Care Act does not just include health insurance scholarships and an extension. Medicaid, but also protections for persons with pre-existing conditions, insurance requirements to be covered and other provisions.
In a lawsuit filed earlier this year, a group of Republican governors and state attorneys, led by Texas, challenged the Affordable Care Act, arguing that the government was not going to get it. the obligation to take out health insurance, called an individual mandate, was unconstitutional.
The individual mandate was governed by a tax penalty applicable to persons without insurance. The Supreme Court upheld the law in 2012 as an exercise of Congress' taxing power. However, as part of the tax redesign signed by President Trump last December, Congress has reduced the fine to zero dollars from 2019. Texas and other plaintiffs say the warrant will now lose its justification Constitutional.
14, Judge O. Connor agreed that the individual warrant was unconstitutional and that the other provisions of the law could not survive without him. On Sunday, he asserted his point of view and said that California and other states in favor of the Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare, had "little chance of succeeding" in their recourse.
The Trump administration did not oppose the postponement of the execution of Judge O. Connor's earlier ruling. The immediate implementation of the decision could cause confusion and "disrupt the health care markets," the court told the Justice Department on December 21.
In a statement released Sunday, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said he "would get things done. "In its fight to keep health care affordable and accessible. "We will protect the health care of Americans and make it clear that it is the law of the land," he said.
California plans to appeal "imminently," a spokesman for the state's attorney general said Sunday.
Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas at the Origin of the Trial, In a statement, he stated that he had "no objection" to the court's decision. impose a suspension because it offers states "the opportunity to develop plans to meet the health care needs of their residents for the day that this decision will ultimately be confirmed". [19659002] "We are eager to defend the district court's ruling that declared Obamacare unconstitutional," said Paxton.
The case should be reviewed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans – and many experts think it will eventually end up in the Supreme Court.
Historically, the Supreme Court was reluctant to override federal laws, especially those rooted in the lives of millions of citizens [19659016]
[ad_2]
Source link
