Democrats in the House Force GOP to Decide on Obamacare Protection
Uncategorized
[ad_1]
This initiative was designed by newly-empowered Democrats for Republicans to publicly vote for or against Obamacare's protection and guarantees for people with pre-existing illnesses. The GOP has been fighting for years against the law, with House Republicans voting in 2017 for its repeal.
On Wednesday, the vote was 235 votes to 192. Three Republicans supported the measure. law. The new rule requires the office of the General Council of the House to represent legislators in any law-related dispute and authorize the use of outside counsel.
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, a New Yorker and Democratic caucus chair, said earlier Wednesday that the stand-alone resolution was an opportunity to show his support for the law.
"This question is so important that we believe outside the context of the package of rules, we want to give our colleagues – Democrats and Republicans – the opportunity to make a record and declare that you stand alongside the American people regarding the Affordable Care Act and the protection of people with preexisting conditions? "Jeffries said before the vote
A federal judge in Texas said last month that the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional because Congress removed the individual term of office by reducing it to $ 0 as of this year.
District Judge Reed O. Connor found that the warrant itself was unconstitutional and that the rest of the law could not be maintained. But he made an order at the end of December, stating that the law could remain in force pending the appeal.
The Trump Government does not defend Obamacare from the lawsuit brought by a coalition of states led by Republicans.
This prompted a group California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who heads this group, appealed Mr. O. Connor's decision last week.
Supporting the Affordable Care Act, including its popular provisions protecting people with less than perfect health histories, helped Democrats take back the House in the November mid-term elections. Since then, party leaders have repeatedly said that they would work quickly to enforce the law.
However, the movement in favor of an intervention is largely symbolic. The case is being examined in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The bill was also intended to give Democrats a chance to appear on the record.
[ad_2]
Source link
