Steve King, rebellious after the House's disapproval resolution, declares that censorship will not occur



[ad_1]

A day after the House of Representatives officially voted to disapprove of his remarks on white supremacy, Iowa's Republican Representative, Steve King, pitched a challenge note, telling Fox News that a more severe vote censuring it would not happen. "

House Majority Leader, Steny Hoyer, D-Md., Proposed Wednesday to refer Democrats' motions to censure King before the Ethics Committee." The House approved the motion by voting aloud of Hoyer, thereby rejecting the resolutions and excluding a vote on the floor for the time being.

Democrat House leaders would have intended to present the motion of censure because they feared to open the door Michigan Representative Rashida Tlaib, for example, described President Trump as "mother" and was photographed dressed in a Palestinian dress with Linda Sarsour, a proponent of Louis Farrakhan. and the Nation of Islam Farrakhan likened Jews to termites and praised Hitler.

Still, leading Democrats warned that King could still be blamed when he made other offensive comments and pl Several major party leaders have called for his expulsion from the House. But questioned about the possibility of being censored on Wednesday afternoon, King burst out laughing.

"No, it's just not going to happen," King told Fox News. "Oh no." He gave the same answer when he was questioned about the possibility of further action on the part of the House.

Censorship – which is more severe than a reprimand or resolution of disapproval, but not as severe as an expulsion – would have a significant but still merely symbolic impact, step. The House has only censored 23 members of history, most recently the former representative of Canada, Charlie Rangel, DN.Y., in December 2010.

King added that c & rsquo; Was a "fact" that critics had misinterpreted his remarks in New York. Recently in an interview and the "record" proves its position.

The controversy comes from a recent interview. "White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization, how did this language become offensive?" King asked the New York Times last week. "Why am I sitting in classes to learn the merits of our history and our civilization?"

King has since declared that he was referring only to the term "Western civilization" to ask how the language had become offensive. "It is clear that I was only referring to Western civilization courses, and no one has ever listened to the merits of white nationalism and white supremacy," he said in a statement released this week.

On Tuesday, the House of Representatives formally reprimanded. King, massively adopting a resolution of disapproval for his comments. Even King voted for the measure, although he strongly opposed GOP leaders removing him from his role as a committee member the day before. King said dismissing the committees was an "unprecedented assault" on his freedom of expression.

The final vote on the disapproval resolution was 424-1, with only the Democratic representative of Illinois, Bobby Rush, voting against.

"Like any rabid animal, Steve King should be put away and isolated."

– The Democratic Representative of Illinois Bobby Rush

"As for any animal that Rush said Tuesday.

WATCH: BRIT HUME CALLS THE KING, BUT SAYS THE JOURNALISTS ARE IRREPONENTABLY AROUND ACCUSATIONS OF RACISM

On Wednesday, Rush told Fox News that there was "a lot of lousy politics and wit" behind the House Democrats' decision to set aside Censorship Resolution

"There is a provision that if Steve King states another racist thing, I have the right to put it together," said Rush. "I'll reserve the right to go back on this question if Steve King was saying a last racist syllable.

Rush added that he was disappointed that the motion of censure had been tabled. The resolution adopted on Tuesday indicates that the House "once again rejects white nationalism and white supremacy as hateful expressions of intolerance that are at odds with the values ​​that define the people of the United States."

The text of the resolution does not explicitly criticize King personally, remarks.

"The resolution yesterday dealt with bigotry, but they ruled out the bigot," said Rush. "The object of the conversation was not even mentioned."

  Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, in 2014. (Photo AP / Charlie Neibergall, File)

Representative Steve King, R-Iowa, in 2014. (AP Photo / Charlie Neibergall, File)

Other Democrats and some Republicans have suggested that additional measures are needed.

"I think the eviction would suit me perfectly," said South Carolina Democrat James Clyburn after the vote on Tuesday.

"Becoming a member of Congress is a unique honor and Steve King's comments on racism and white supremacy are totally disqualifying," Maryland Democratic Representative John Delaney said in a statement. "King is unfit for a job and does not belong in our body politic or in our national speech, it's time for Steve King to go."

Click to access the application Fox News

In an editorial published Tuesday, the monks' register has agreed.

"Congressman Steve King should resign," the editorial says. "He even lost the potential to effectively represent his constituents of Iowa because of his obnoxious comments on white nationalism and white supremacy."

Chad Pergram and James Myers of Fox News contributed to the writing of this report.

[ad_2]
Source link