Great Britain and the EU must tackle the real problems of Brexit

The Brexit was a disaster that could still be repaired / Flickr / freeimage4life

At the exit Great Britain and the European Union had just started to discuss, this only seemed to be a refusal to "participate in the team". The negotiations on Brexit proved to be really problematic, partly because of the oversimplification of the promises made to voters before the notorious referendum

But now the situation seems different.According to the American observer of Bloomberg, Barry Ritolts, there will be no Brexit, and in 2023, these events would seem to be something funny, as if lost episode of "Folt Towers". The author proposes in the United Kingdom three measures to be taken to remedy the situation.

First, it is time to recognize the convictions of its opponents. In any negotiation or debate, each party must understand the point of view of others. If that is not done, the situation goes into a stalemate. For this reason, uncompromising politicians can never manage to manage governments. Those who want Britain to stay in the EU should not declare a team of those who want to abandon the European Union as dishonorable or unworthy.

See also Foreign policy: The absurd dream of Brexit comes to an end

] Of course, the supporters of the exit of the European organization lied before the referendum . They also used racist intimidation and played in fear of strangers to pay attention to voters. But if you reject this rhetoric of hate, the important problem of the right of any sovereign country to conduct an international policy, to control its borders and to decide who will be a citizen or not will be at the root. Here are really real and complex problems. And EU supporters have not always approached them frankly and directly.

The Brexit Camp must admit that its promises are fast, economical and easy – it is simply a question of giving the best result at the best of times. And in the worst case, it's a disappointment. The negotiations, which lasted more than two years, clearly showed how the rejection of EU membership would be expensive and difficult. And the supporters of the exit, refusing to recognize the reality, only aggravate the current difficult situation

. The second step is to restart the debate. It is time to realize that all efforts to organize Brexit have been a waste of time. And these are irreversible losses. British Prime Minister Teresa May has faced an impossible mission of creating a more or less acceptable scenario. Given the incredible promise of a camp outside the EU, his job was doomed from the start. Unsurprisingly, she could not do anything. Therefore, in the interest of the country, it must resign, regardless of the result of the vote by vote of censure.

The new prime minister must determine what each party proposes. Maybe even have to organize a new referendum. But instead of a simplified direct vote, it should reflect reality. In fact, any new referendum should not offer just two answers: leave or stay. This should mark two very real things: the real cost of production and the long-term damage to the economy, as well as an explanation that the EU will have to face the problems of national sovereignty if Britain remains.

The country must keep all the promises of its Brexit supporters past the referendum, reject the empty ones and start working on what was left.

Read also The failure of Brexit: May called the worst case scenario for the United Kingdom

The third step is to improve the European Union Theory partly explains why the EU has had to adopt such a restrictive stance towards the United Kingdom. At the very least, it does not seem that other countries have seemed attracted by the abandonment of membership. But this position has already been communicated to all. And second-rate thinking offers a new opportunity: to use the chaos around Brexit to face the legitimate challenges of international relations, sovereignty and security that apply to all member states of the world. EU.

What could it look like? It is possible to strengthen its commitment to NATO and its common commitments, to resolve the crisis by the influx of refugees from Africa and the Middle East to the level of the African Union. The whole EU and to examine ways to reduce the threats to the security and economic problems of Russia. As a result, the British understood that Brexit would be neither free nor simple, many serious problems had been raised and that the EU should solve them in the interest of the whole of the world. ;Union.