[ad_1]
The choice of the Attorney General of President Donald Trump by the President does not make it legal, according to the choice of the President.
Rudy Giuliani, the current Trump attorney, attacked the BuzzFeed report by wrongly attributing it to Cohen.
"If you believe that Cohen, I can give you a lot Brooklyn Bridge," said Giuliani.
Giuliani issued another statement Friday, saying: "Any suggestion – from any source – that the president would have advised Michael Cohen to lie is categorically wrong."
But if Barr is confirmed as prosecutor General, as it is likely, he will supervise special advocate Robert Mueller and other federal prosecutors. And those officials would be the ones investigating Trump's prevention of justice by ordering Cohen to lie to Congress.
Mueller is the prosecutor who indicted Cohen for lying to Congress. In March, Cohen is expected to begin serving a three-year prison sentence for this crime and other crimes, including those related to the payment of hidden sums to Trump's alleged ex-paramours.
BuzzFeed reported on Thursday: "The special attorney's office learned about Trump's directive that Cohen was to lie to Congress through interviews with several witnesses from the Trump organization , internal corporate emails, SMS and a cache of documents. "
" Cohen then confessed these instructions during his interviews with this office, "the report said.
Klobuchar, in his interrogation of Barr, focused on a memo that he had sent – unsolicited – to the Department of Justice last year.
She also asked him a series of hypothetical questions about Trump's conduct.
In this note, Barr argued that Mueller should not be allowed to demand that Trump be questioned by the Special Council's office about an "alleged impediment" to his firing of the FBI director, James Comey, in 2017, who said Trump had asked him to "let … pass" an investigation into former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn's contacts with the Russians.
Barr argued that the pursuit of a case of obstruction against a president for exercising power – to remove a subordinate – that he has under the Constitution.
But in the same memo, Barr writes, "It is obvious that the president and any other official may be obstructing the classic sense of sabotage of a search for the truth."
"So for example, if a president knowingly destroys or modifies evidence, preserves perjury or causes a witness to change his or her testimony, "wrote Barr.
Klobuchar developed on this line during his questions asked on Tuesday
Klobuchar: In your memo, you talked about the Comey decision and the obstruction of justice, and you already have some spoken, what I appreciate. You wrote on page 1 that a president persuading a person to commit perjury would be a hindrance, is not it?
Barr: Yes. Or, no matter which, finally, you know, anyone who persuades another de – yeah.
Klobuchar: OK. You also said that a president or anyone convincing a witness to change his or her testimony would be an impediment. Is it true?
Barr: Yes.
Klobuchar. D & # 39; AGREEMENT. And on page 2, you say that a president who deliberately undermines the integrity or availability of evidence would be a [obstruction]. Is it correct?
Barr: Yes.
Klobuchar: OK.
So what happens if a president tells a witness not to cooperate with an investigation or refers to a pardon?
Barr: You know, I should know the specific facts – I should know the specific facts.
Klobuchar: OK. And you wrote on page 1 that if a president knowingly destroys or modifies evidence, that would be an impediment.
Barr: Yes.
Klobuchar: OK. So what happens if a president writes a misleading statement to conceal the purpose of a meeting?
Barr: Again, you know, I'd have, I should know about it, I should know the details.
[ad_2]
Source link
