[ad_1]
The intensity of animosity directed against President Trump by liberal media reached new heights with the publication of the false report of BuzzFeed, alleging that the president told his lawyer to lie to Congress on its trade relations with Russia. .
At the time of the publication of the article, the liberal media jumped for joy – and the drumbeat began – by repeating the lies beginning with a common mantra used by many journalists: "If that's true … "
You can fill the spaces from there." If that's true. . . "- all together now -" the president has committed a crime and should be indicted. "
A BUZZFEED RECALL WITH A FALSE ATTACK ON THE TRUMP IS MEDIA MALPRACTICE
the media and the airwaves for hours It did not matter that the president immediately denied the accusations. that the mainstream media could not confirm the BuzzFeed report – something that usually happens quickly when an article of this nature has broken in.
Some members of the media have not forgotten that. Consider this Washington editorial Review:
"We wrote an editorial urging people to be cautious about this big story, and given Trump's media background, we did not need to be seers to make that warning. But for so many journalists, whose disgust for Trump has become an obstacle to their professional credibility, this story was just too good to be People continued to believe it, wanting to believe it, even after the two reporters in history gave contradictory information as to whether they had seen the documents in question. "
In what can only be described as an unprecedented initiative, the Bureau
Peter Carr, spokesman for Robert Mueller's office, issued a powerful statement:" The description given by BuzzFeed to the office of Special advice and characterization of documents and testimonies obtained by this office, regarding the testimony of Michael Cohen in Congress, is not correct. "
Let's take a moment to unpack this statement. The special council is organized around three axes: 1) "Description by BuzzFeed of specific statements to the office of the special council", 2) "and characterizations of documents", 3) "and testimonies obtained by this office, concerning testimonies Michael Cohen's Congress, are inaccurate. "
These are three critical areas that are NOT accurate: the description of specific statements – the characterization of documents – and testimonials compiled read by the office of the special advisor – ARE NOT EXACT. That's what the Special Council Office says – the entity that actually heads the investigation.
President Trump did not delay in thanking the Special Council Office: "It was a totally fictitious story and I appreciate the fact that the special council a statement last night," he said. Trump told reporters on the South Lawn of the White House before a visit to Dover Air Base Saturday.
Even a denial from the Special Council Office could not silence the detractors of President Trump. The chairman of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Said Sunday that he would investigate "in an absolute way" on the BuzzFeed report. Based on what?
CLICK HERE TO GET THE APP FOX NEWS
And then there's the fact that BuzzFeed stays true to its deeply flawed story. Ben Smith, editor-in-chief of BuzzFeed, said: "We are sticking to our reports and the sources that have informed them, and we urge the Special Adviser to clarify what he is challenging." Disturbing.
As the president's attorney, expose BuzzFeed's narrative by proving once again that factual unfounded media speculation undermines the credibility of the media. itself but represents a danger to our constitutional republic.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY JAY SEKULOW
Source link
