[ad_1]
When President Donald Trump on Saturday announced an agreement on a "compromise" with Democrats, he avoided mentioning several proposals for major changes, including how the country manages the temporary protection status of people from other countries. ravaged by war or war. disaster and for immigrant youth known as "dreamers".
In his announcement on Saturday, Trump proposed a three-year extension of some 700,000 so-called "dreamer" children, illegally taken to the United States by their parents, who had been granted protection status under the law. 39, deferred action for the arrest of former President Barack Obama's childhood. (DACA), as well as for recipients whose status is temporarily protected and whose status is about to expire.
While Trump's bill would provide temporary assurances to these groups, critics of the president's proposal argue that this proposal undermines key protections for vulnerable populations.
"This false" compromise "would weaken the asylum system, deprive vulnerable children of essential guarantees … and hide the protections afforded to people from countries ravaged by natural disasters or war", he said. Lorella Praeli, Deputy Policy Director of the ACLU. .
Adrees Latif / Reuters The following are the main proposals that pose problems for Immigration lawyers and experts.
Severe Restrictions on Minors in Central America
Minors in Central America approaching the US-Mexico border would no longer be eligible for asylum. Instead, most would be forced to wait in their home country and had to have a parent or guardian already present in the United States.
"This totally changes our concept of protection of asylum," said Greg Chen, director of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
The bill would require the State Department to establish treatment centers in Central American countries. While this may be a viable option for claimants who can afford to wait in their home country, this could pose a threat to asylum seekers fleeing violence and persecution.
"It's like keeping a child waiting in a burning building and reassuring him about his safety," said Royce Bernstein Murray, executive director of the American Immigration Council.
Alex Brandon / AP [19659007] President Donald Trump talks about the Government Closure Party, Immigration and Border Security at the White House, Washington, DC, January 19, 2019.
Permanent Changes to Temporary Protections
Currently, refugees from 10 countries selected have temporary protection status because of their original areas of violent origin or have been damaged by natural disasters. Trump's proposal would remove from this list all African countries as well as Muslim-majority countries like Syria and Yemen, leaving only El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras and Nicaragua.
The proposal would also limit to a large extent the temporary protections afforded to persons already legally in the United States. Immigration experts believe that it would actually be a "dismemberment" of the original program.
"This would eliminate [temporary protection] the eligibility of almost all those who currently have it, for example, because of the lack of legal presence," Murray said.
Tougher fines for dreamers seeking a change of status
For DACA beneficiaries seeking a more permanent status, the bill would criminalize "any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement" in the application process , punishable If lying on a federal document is currently a crime if the lie is substantial, the proposal would open the plaintiffs to the possibility of being sued for minor errors.
The proposed bill only extends DACA temporary protections to those currently covered and renewing their applications. Young people recently illegally introduced to the country are still unable to apply for the first time to join the DACA.
The major challenge of proving that migrants deserve asylum
The penalties applicable to misinformation contained in applications also extend to asylum seekers, when new standards could result in rejection of the application.
Immigration advocates view these restrictions as excessive and say they are harmful to people who have a legitimate claim for asylum. For example, bribery in the country of origin of the plaintiff may help a plaintiff to unintentionally obtain fraudulent documents. The ability of an applicant to defend himself in these circumstances would be limited.
"This bill is one of the many ways in which bona fide asylum seekers could be harmed," said Heidi Altman, director of policy at the National Immigrant Justice Center.
In an effort to place immigration lawyers at an unprecedented level, the proposal sets out new requirements to prove that an asylum claim is worthy of approval.
For example, if an asylum claim is not "in the national interest", these are grounds for rejection under Trump's new proposal.
ABC News's Serena Marshall contributed to the report.
Source link
