[ad_1]
P Trump resident's strategy of forcing a government to shut down for funding for a wall at the border took another blow on Thursday: a Democratic bill to reopen the government collected more votes in the Senate under Republican control than its own compromise bill that included wall funding.
There is currently more evidence of Trump's support fracture than of disunity between Democrats and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Shows no signs of recoil . The chances that Trump has its border wall are dwindling day by day.
Looking at how badly Trump played on the wall of the border, which dates back to the beginning of his presidency, when his party controlled both branches of Congress and had just won an election victory, really highlights a missing ingredient that has severely trumpy agenda in jeopardy. It's up to the staff. The Trump administration has included people who want to fight for his agenda and who have little or no experience in performing tasks within the government. He also has people who have experience with the government, but are not loyal to his program. There are very few people who have both attributes. And many who have neither one nor the other.
This is one of the most common complaints of people friendly to Trump, but frustrated with the progress made on a number of issues, whether in immigration, care health or foreign policy. Just look at Pelosi and how she exercised her power in the fight against the wall of the border. Even on something ultimately unimportant, such as the state of the Union. She knew that she had the power to block a joint session of Congress and thus prevent her from delivering a highly publicized speech to the House of Commons. She claimed that this power was maintained and that Trump had given in. It just reinforced the feeling that Democrats know how to use power when they need it to fight, but Republicans never do. Trump was supposed to change things, but he was not able to do it because he lacked the right people.
Consultants such as Stephen Miller or, earlier, Steve Bannon, basically support the Trump program. But none of them had the skills needed to reach a consensus on Capitol Hill or to exercise its power so as to strengthen policies through Congress. Former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and former Chief of Staff John Kelly have acquired a reputation for competence, but they clearly do not completely agree with Trumpism and have spent a lot of their time holding it.
There is no need to be a conspiracy theorist about "deep state" to recognize that many employees in government agency positions hate Trump and want to thwart his program. Even many appointees have approached their work as if their goal was to manage it rather than wage war for its policies – an infamous sentiment demonstrated by the anonymous New York Times letter.
We saw other numbers that were sort of the worst of both worlds. Reince Priebus had been an effective chairman of RNC, but he was unable to become a chief of staff and he did not share Trump's vision for the country either. Former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was perhaps an impressive CEO, but he was completely out of reach in Foggy Bottom and fought to undermine Trump's foreign policy, particularly with respect to Iran.
Trump's greatest achievements come from areas where people working together shared a) shared goals and b) knew how to make them happen. A perfect example is the candidates for the judiciary, in which former White House lawyer Don McGahn consulted with outside groups such as the Federalist Society who wanted to help Trump fulfill its promise to appoint conservative judges. The Trump team coordinated closely with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Who understood what it would take for many of them to be confirmed.
Successes have also been recorded in some areas of regulatory policy.
But Trump is seriously lacking people who truly believe in his cause and who know enough how to get things done in Washington. The reality is that the Republicans had the power in 2017 to build a wall if someone knew both the immigration policy and the legislative tactics allowing Trump to exploit that power. This was always going to be a major challenge as a foreigner, against party power, with many experienced hands in the party that refuses to join the administration.
So it is in the current situation – a prolonged closure in which it lacks leverage. On one side, people who want him to yield and offer more vine leaves to Democrats, and on the other, those who are eager to see him continue the fight without winning strategy. This is the story of much of the Trump presidency.
[ad_2]
Source link
