[ad_1]
For his part, Harris demands that funds be made available directly to the American middle class and workers – an approach that seems less political than that of its rivals, but which focuses on the immediate concerns of voters.
"These are inverted images of each other," said Howard Gleckman, senior researcher at the Non-Partisan Tax Policy Center. Harris is really committed to giving a large tax credit to low and middle income people. She is less focused on how she is going to pay. Warren is exactly the opposite. She focuses primarily on taxing the rich and does not much, yet, about what she would do with the money. "
Harris, who will be attending a CNN town hall on Monday night from Iowa, is also supportive of raising the taxes of the top 1% richest," said Lily Adams, its director of communications The Senator first introduced her tax credit idea for the middle class last fall after hearing from people whose paychecks do not match the cost of living. at home,
Unlike a conventional tax credit, the bill would also allow taxpayers to benefit from the allowance – up to $ 500 – on a monthly basis. According to the proposal, this would offer families an alternative to payday loans, usually with very high interest rates.
However, the non-partisan Tax Policy Center estimated that the total cost would be $ 3 trillion over 10 years.
Harris proposes to pay him by repealing the provisions of the 2017 GOP Tax Act that benefit these people. earn more than $ 100,000 and charge fees to financial institutions. But experts say this is not enough to cover the cost.
The Bill entitled LIFT of the Middle Class Act, or Income of Life for today's families, aims to expand the tax benefits accorded to American workers. It would supplement the earned income tax credit, which allows low-income parents to work. However, the Harris bill would also provide credit to the childless.
Extending the EITC to a larger number of people – especially men without children – has long enjoyed bipartisan support, although Republicans have more recently opposed the idea. , the cost, said Alan Viard, a resident researcher at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. And the GOP is not likely to support the legislation proposed by a Democratic presidential candidate.
Source link