El Chapo's defense presents his arguments and rests after half an hour



[ad_1]

The defense pleaded its case on Tuesday in the trial of the chief drug accuser, Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman – after about 30 minutes and a single witness.

In contrast, the prosecution interviewed 56 astonishing witnesses in 10 weeks

Defense attorney Jeffrey Lichtman had a goal, casting doubt on the testimony of two of the main witnesses of the Co-operative accusation: brothers Jorge and Alex Cifuentes. [19659003] So he called the FBI special agent, Paul Roberts, who was not directly involved in this case, but who, in February 2017, interviewed Jorge Cifuentes Villa. Cifuentes was reported to be one of Guzman's cocaine suppliers in Colombia, with a family active in the drug trade for decades.

Guzman was assaulted by the witness in the courtroom.

Roberts said he interviewed Cifuentes for "a few hours." He told her that in October 2010, he had received a visit from a US Navy intelligence officer who had shown him a USB key containing information, including recordings collected against himself, his family and Chapo.

EL EL CHAPO, & WEEK WEAR, A CORRESPONDING HOLD

Lichtman tried to tell the FBI agent that he was surprised to hear of a "twisted" US official, but between the hesitations of the witness and the objections upheld by the judge In fact, Lichtman disputed with his own witness, leading Judge Brian Cogan to remind him that he was not in cross-examination.

After the dismissal of the witness, Lichtman then read a stipulation of another witness who could not get pro The statement acknowledged that Special Agent Patrick Guidelson had questioned Alex Cifuentes and that he had indicated that Guzman had incurred a debt of $ 20 million between 2007 and 2013.

"On these bases, the defense is based, "added Lichtman.

CLICK HERE TO ACCESS APP FOX NEWS

The closing arguments for prosecution and defense are scheduled for Wednesday and Thursday, respectively. The defense will then have its last move to try to convince the 12 jurors of Guzman's innocence.

From the first day of this trial, the defense attempted to sell Guzman as a braggart for the crimes of El Mayo Zambada and suggesting that his partner had conspired. against him with the Mexican government and perhaps the US government.

[ad_2]
Source link