A London judge said that Poroshenko had grounds to accuse the BBC of defamation, the upcoming trial.



[ad_1]

At a preliminary hearing of the High Court in London, the judge found that the lawyers of Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko had sufficient arguments to sue the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) ) for defamation.

C, published on television news on May 23, 2018, as well as an article in English on the BBC News website.

The title of an online article, currently unavailable, reported that "Trump lawyer Ukraine had paid" for organizing negotiations at the White House. "[19659003] According to the report, the mediators who worked for the Ukrainian leader gave Michael Cohen $ 400,000 to secure the president Petro Poroshenko with the American president Donald Trump in Washington in June 2017

Lawyers representing President Poroshenko stated at a hearing held on February 7 that the report was completely false because it created an impression of the leader's involvement Ukrainian in the corruption that he launches.

Message B -By-Si refers to anonymous sources in the village Ravi Michael Cohen, a former personal attorney Donald Trump, whose US court sentenced to three years in prison for illegal payments, false testimony and tax evasion

A judge sees a problem

The lawyers of the British Broadcasting Corporation stated at the hearing that he report The BBC correspondents do not directly state that Poroshenko himself is involved in a possible bribe.

But the side of the Ukrainian president argued that the BBC had reported that the audience thought that Poroshenko could personally know, or even have $ 400,000 paid to Michael Cohen, as they say,

The allegations of corruption, although not expressly expressed, are the general conclusions that the viewer / reader receives from the publication as a whole

According to the London reporter [19459004[BernieTorah] following the case, the judge Matthew Niklin agrees with the heavy claims of Petro Poroshenko's lawyers.

"Allegations of corruption, although not expressly expressed, are the general conclusion that the viewer / reader receives from the publication as a whole." This is an obvious subtext that emerges from information about the circumstances of payment. to Mr. Cohen "quotes Judge Bernie Tor.

The judge should announce that the case will be further examined to see whether the BBC has been released or not.

[ad_2]
Source link