[ad_1]
Howard Schultz on CBS This Morning Jan. 29, 2019.
Photo: Michele Crowe / CBS via Getty Images
Howard Schultz's presidential campaign has been open to mixed criticism – among the popular demographic group of socially liberal and fiscally moderate billionaire bosses. (Michael Bloomberg expressed his disapproval, while Schultz himself expressed great enthusiasm.) All other demographic categories recorded a catastrophic negative response. Change Research revealed that Schultz had a favorable rating among the public of 4%, 40% seeing it unfavorably and the rest not knowing who it was.
The survey even convinced the respondents to describe Schultz well – "Howard Schultz is a true American success story … He thinks that the system is broken and that there are extremists on both sides and that only an independent centrist can solve the problems that Republicans and Democrats refuse to solve. " – who nevertheless failed to convince more than 9% of the public expressed support for the Schultz campaign against any opponent. Polls again revealed that Schultz's disappointing percentage of support was nonetheless enough to tip Donald Trump's election against most of the possible Democratic opponents. It is therefore true that almost no one likes Schultz and that he could get enough votes to reelect Trump.
Perhaps in an attempt to repel this data, the Schultz team published very partial internal survey data. Somewhat suspiciously, the data do not indicate what information was provided to respondents about Schultz, possibly to encourage them to support him. The final figures showed that Schultz got 17% of the national vote in a three-way race with Trump and Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren. The same numbers showed that Trump beat both Democrats between 33 and 32 percent.
In other words, Schultz's own polls indicate that he would lose badly and start the race at Trump. The independent poll is even worse than that.
Partisan Republicans provided one of the few sources of support for Schultz's candidacy. The Wall Street Journal contains an editorial praising Schultz and attacking his Democratic detractors for being afraid of his still hypothetical ideas. "They seem to fear a political debate," laughs at the editorial, which at no time even contemplates the possibility that Democrats actually fear Schultz's spoiler potential. Schultz approves on Twitter in the editorial.
Fox News reports that Schultz "told councilors that he was shocked by the strident attacks by democrats", which, if true, would indicate ignorance of the political system so proud that it would be disqualifying. In case he does not follow this closely, many people really want to defeat Trump and really do not want to open the window to a historically unpopular president with a solid base but a very low ceiling of approval to pass a divided voter. with a minority of the vote.
Apparently, Schultz expected his announcement to be relayed as a new seasonal coffee flavor. It turns out that people really do not like this type of trump and do not want a wealthy political tourist to get lost in a political war to which they devote all the hours awake for to win! Who knew?
[ad_2]
Source link
