[ad_1]
Juridic
A judge publicly criticized Defense lawyers on behalf of a Russian company charged with criminal charges by special advocate Robert Mueller, accusing the firm's lawyers of submitting unprofessional and inappropriate records to the court attacking the office Mueller and having recklessly assailed legal records of shocking quotes taken from films like Animal House.
: Stop, "said Dabney Friedrich Judge of the US District Court to the Russian Society's lawyers Concord Management and Consulting, during a brief hearing in Washington Monday morning.
9] The tone and content of the observations of Concord's aggressive lawyers, Eric Dubelier and Kate Seikaly, in recent months have been unusual for lawyers practicing in federal court. A document tabled last week quoted both the 19 e British historian, Lord Acton, and a slightly disinfected statement uttered by "a little less scholarly, Otter," a brother of the fraternity in the House of Classic animals of the 1970s.
Friedrich, the most recent of the three people named by President Donald Trump in Washington court, made it clear Monday that she was not amused by what happened. she called the "intelligent quotes". She also rebuked Dubelier for his ad hominem attacks against Mueller's lawyers and other prosecutors in the case.
"I found your recent filings, especially your reply filed on Friday, unprofessional, inappropriate and ineffective," said the judge. She suggested that the bids were an effort to persuade her to accept pending defense motions to give Concord owners and agents better access to the documents provided by Mueller's office to allow the defense to prepare for the trial.
When Friedrich signaled to Dubelier to appear in front of the courtroom to deal with more technical matters concerning the exchange of information, he refused to say anything of substance, stating that the judge's criticism was so severe that he might need to withdraw from the case. He also accused Friedrich of partiality.
"I have to discuss this with my client," said Dubelier, former federal attorney for the law firm Reed Smith. "There seems to be some bias on the part of the court."
Friedrich insisted that there was no bias and that the documents filed by the defense were clearly inappropriate, but Dubelier disagreed.
"This is your opinion," said the defense attorney. Friedrich largely convened the Monday morning hearing to deliver a public dress to Dubelier. After a few routine problems and a brief discussion of the proceedings to be held in open court, the judge expelled the press and members of the public and put the court in a sealed hearing.
The hearing room unveiled some of the tension created by Concord's unexpected decision to challenge the criminal charges, a grand jury acting at Mueller's request returned in February against the cabinet, two other Russian companies and 13 Russian people. The charges allege a conspiracy to use a disguised social media campaign and an on-the-ground organization to interfere in the 2016 US presidential election.
Much of the 39 the effort was to elect Trump, according to the indictment, but some actions were supported. Clinton or just seemed to aim to maximize chaos, conflict and dissension between Americans.
Since the beginning, Concord's lawyers have not only fought the court charges, but have also used the vehicle of court records and public hearings to organize a public campaign. Prosecutors accused Concord's lawyers and some of his supporters of challenging Mueller's legitimacy and the validity of the idea that the online turmoil was a criminal conspiracy against the United States.
At the beginning of the year, the companies and 13 Russians also put in place a considerable number of public postures. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein personally announced the indictment at a press conference of the Department of Justice.
Many members of the Department of Justice and outside the Department of Justice considered the indictment from the beginning as an attempt to "smear", intended to put the government Russian at the shelter. that such actions would be revealed and pursued by the United States. The likelihood of one of the accused appearing in US court, however, seemed remote.
Concord's decision to challenge the charges broke that expectation and made it at a relatively low cost for these people. accused in the case, including Evgeniy Prigozhin, a Russian businessman and restaurateur known as the leader of Putin. Under US law, the company is entitled to the full panoply of US constitutional rights, even though no business-related person is likely to go to jail as long as it does not. is not detained in the United States.
