[ad_1]
. Elizabeth Warren – who may be thinking about a White House decision in 2020 should think seriously about this decision, suggested the Boston Globe editorial board in an article published Thursday.
(Reuters, File)
The Boston Globe editorial board – which had called Massachusetts Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren to run for president in 2016 – wrote in an article on Thursday suggesting that She has now become too "divisional" and it would be better to stay in the Senate rather than fight President Trump in 2020. "
" If Warren is an effective and hard-hitting senator with a significant voice in the world, he is the only one in the world. nationally, it has become a divisive factor, "wrote the editors. "A unifying voice is what the country needs now after the polarization of Donald Trump's policy."
We are very far from 2015, when the council wrote: "The Democrats would make a serious mistake when it comes to politics. they left Hillary Clinton presidential nomination with no real opposition and, as a national leader, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren can ensure that this does not happen. While Warren has repeatedly vowed that she would not run for the presidency herself, she should reconsider her decision. "
" It is difficult to run for the presidency. Decide not to run? This can be even more difficult, "began Thursday's text, before noting the announcement of the former Massachusetts Democratic governor, Deval Patrick, that he would not be launching a run at the ######################################################################### Horizon 2020.
While congratulating Patrick for his tenure, he reportedly stated that he "would have been a formidable candidate," the publication urged other state lawmakers "apparently considering elections presidential "to" think carefully before launching themselves too. "
The newspaper noted that many lawmakers who were considering considering an offer at the White House.They also recalled that in 2015," the editorial page invited Warren to introduce himself, in part to because of the lack of serious competition against Hillary Clinton. "
HARRIS AND WARREN, AT THE EYE OF 2020, CAN NOT SUPPORT TRUMP-BACKED PRISON REFORM
In the end, Clinton became the Democratic candidate and was defeated by Trump in the general election.
But there is not so much a need for Democratic candidates to run this time.
"With or without the Massachusetts candidates, he seems that the party will have a very open field, with very diverse cultures and ideologies, "they declared by listing several possible candidates.
Warren did not seize the open window of the odds of success in the 2016 election and maintained "There is enough to be skeptical" about her possible success as a candidate, the Globe said, while noting the results of a survey in the state.
"Governor Baker has garnered more votes than a state is supposed to be a democratic haven," writes The Globe. "Meanwhile, a poll in September found that Massachusetts voters were more enthusiastic about the state of the art. idea of making an offer to the White House that Warren. "
THE CHOICE OF OBAMA: A REPRESENTATIVE JOINS AN EX-PRESIDENT AT THE HEART OF MANY ALLIES EYES 2020
n Warren has not hesitated to run against President Trump, saying that after the mid-term elections, she "would look closely at the possibility of running for president."
While acknowledging the difficulty of politicians to decide not to launch a campaign after having already suggested taking it into consideration, the Globe pointed out Patrick's ability to do so.
"There is no shame in testing the waters and deciding to stay on the beach ", did they [19659005] Mike Emanuel of Fox News contributed to this report.
Source link
