[ad_1]
The order puts in abeyance the contempt quote pronounced by a federal judge of the Federal Court against a company related to a summons to appear before the grand jury, but long enough for the judges to decide whether or not to do so. they wish to intervene in the case.
The pause lasts until the court has time to consider an expected response from the government by December 31st at the latest.
Judicial proceedings are the latest twist in the secret affair, much of which is under seal and has made its way into the federal justice system with unusual speed.
This is the first known judicial remedy apparently related to Mueller's investigation. his way up to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court could be seized separately from an appeal of the case.
"As far as we know, the Court never had an argument before the nine judges," the minister said. Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas Law School. "They can keep portions of the minutes and briefings sealed, and often do, as in cases involving trade secrets.But there is no procedure in the rules of the court for that." the entire case is briefed, argued and judged. " I am aware of the place where the parties have tried it, the court refused the certiorari "or the review of the case.
The company's challenge regarding the subpoena seems to have started in September In its decision last week, the US Circuit Appeals Court for the District of Columbia gave little clue about the company and its country of origin, nor about the Objectives of the Mueller Team.
In a short passage of the three-page decision, the judges describe how they confidentially learned from prosecutors that they had a "reasonable probability" that the requested documents involve acts committed outside the United States but having directly affected the US Even the company was not informed of what prosecutors had on the issue because disclosing it to the company would have violated the secret of the grand jury investigation, o nt said the judges.
The range of possibilities regarding the identity of the company is vast. . The company may be a sovereign bank or a technology or information society supported by the state. Mueller investigators frequently contacted these types of companies who received information requests in the course of the investigation.
The work of President Mueller focused on the links between the Trump campaign and Russia's efforts to intervene in the presidential election, prosecutors and CNN reported that the Mueller team has examined actions related to the interests of the Turkish, Ukrainian and other governments.
Mueller previously indicted three Russian companies and 25 Russians for alleged contributions to a social media propaganda project aimed at influencing US voters and hacking American voters. the Democratic Party. Special Advocate and other Justice Department units pursue several investigations related to Mueller's main mission
Another problem raised by subpoena in Mueller, written by Andrew Miller, associate of Roger Stone, had started the trial several months before the start of the shares of the limited company. Miller's case is also in front of the DC circuit, but the judges have not decided yet. His case became public after his lawyers announced publicly his intention to challenge Mueller and the subpoena.
Society in the Supreme Court challenge has remained secret – as has the grand jury process to which it is bound. And the company, the prosecutors and the court of first instance strove not to reveal the identity of the people involved in the case. Security locked an entire floor of the Washington DC federal courthouse on the morning of the company's pleading on appeal, so that lawyers entering and leaving the courtroom would not be seen.
[ad_2]
Source link
