[ad_1]
congress
One last chance in favor of the Wall of Trump could disrupt Parliament's leadership projects
Republican House leaders struggle to rally their own members to a finance bill that deprives President Donald Trump of a seeks to win the border, without any certainty about what he could do next.
The Conservatives go wild on Wednesday at the prospect of a bogus bill that would curtail funding issues at the border in February, when & # 39; 39, they argue allegedly before the House, Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) Escape Trump's last chance for a wall before 2020.
The story continues below
The Senate unanimously approved the catch-up bill on Wednesday night, a sign of retreat which has further inflamed the Conservatives of the House, who have accused their leaders of being saved from the struggle for immigration on their last day of control of both houses of Congress.
"Do we really think we are going to build a security wall at the border when Nancy Pelosi will be Speaker of the House?" Said Wednesday representative Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), one of the leaders of the caucus of the House of Freedom. when he tabled an amendment to the 11th hour to add $ 5 billion to the funding of the bill. "It's our last chance," he said.
Trump on Thursday morning seemed to refute this idea, saying that he would have more weight to impose the border wall problem, even after Democrats took control of the House.
"Democrats, who know that steel slats (walls) are necessary for border security, put politics on the country, and what they are just beginning to understand is that I will not sign none of their laws, including their infrastructure, unless security at the border is perfect USA WINS! "Trump wrote.
He also made it clear that he would sign the draft financing bill, saying that he had already fortified the border, making it less urgent funding for a wall.
"Wall, people are losing sight of the great work done by our Border Patrol, ICE and our big military on our southern border," Trump said on Twitter. "Do you remember the Caravans? Well, they did not come through and no one is formed or is heading in. The border is narrow … False silent news!"
The leaders of the House of Representatives of the Government had privately predicted that the bill would be presented to the prosecution Thursday with broad bipartisan support, probably avoiding a partial government shutdown before Christmas. But the prospect of a quick and no-theater vote was questioned on Wednesday night, with many Republican lawmakers suggesting that GOP leaders had a number problem.
In the face of the anticipated backlash of Thursday's presumed vote, the House Rules Working Group decided 1 I will postpone the debate on what should happen with the funding bill, instead leaving the plenary the GOP will look into the matter at a closed meeting on Thursday.
The presence of Republican leaders in the House could also be problematic: Wednesday, 44 non-Republican performances were recorded. Almost all are Republicans who have lost their reelection or have chosen not to run next year.
With the freedom caucus almost always in opposition, GOP leaders can not afford to lose more votes if they want a majority of Republicans.
Dozens of Democrats are almost certain to support the bill. Its adoption is therefore probably not compromised. But a poor performance among Republicans in the House would be embarrassing for House Speaker Paul Ryan in his final vote – and that could embolden Trump to force the government's closure that he was threatening as recently as the week last.
I do not know what will happen tomorrow. I do not think anybody will know what will happen tomorrow, "said Wednesday evening Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-Ala.), Who supports the claims of Trump's Wall.
Freedom Caucus President Mark Meadows (RN.C.) and more than a dozen other Conservatives spoke Wednesday night in the House to deliver a series of speeches aimed at get more money for the wall.
"My President, we will support you, if you veto this bill, we will be there," Meadows said. A few hours earlier, he had tweeted that a punch in February would be a "Valentine's Day gift" to Pelosi and his deputies.
The bill provides money for fences at the border: the current $ 1.3 billion budget is used again. nearly $ 1.6 billion requested by the Senate as part of a funding agreement. Trump had originally asked for $ 5 billion, although it seems since declining on that figure.
The lack of fresh money remains however a symbolic problem for GOP lawmakers like Byrne, a defense hawk who generally votes for credit bills. He is also an opponent of immigration and promised Wednesday to oppose the bill.
The seven-week bill also does not provide for new funds for disaster relief, despite the hopeful statements of GOP spending leaders to provide assistance to states such as the United States. Florida, Georgia and California.
Rep. Austin Scott (R-Ga.) Said that a group of lawmakers from the Southeast states would oppose any funding bill not including at least disaster assistance. for farmers affected by coastal storms this fall.
"Absolutely not," Scott said firmly, when asked if he would support the bill in its current form.
"I think many Southeast people recognize that this disaster payment for our region has," Scott said, calling for a specific policy change that would free up additional money for farmers whose harvests were devastated by storms.
While Republicans suggested the possibility that Trump could veto the bill without additional funding, Michael Burgess (R-Texas) said the Congress could still avoid a stop on Friday.
"I am not aware of any conversation with the President … but as far as they listen, a veto of this bill is something that could be maintained ", said Burgess, hinting that lawmakers could overturn Trump's final appeal.
Source link
