[ad_1]
Democrats plan to vote on a bipartisan package of six Senate spending bills and an interim measure to reopen the Department of Homeland Security at its current funding levels until February 8, announced the collaborator. The temporary measure would maintain the current $ 1.3 billion for border security, which could be used to close and repair existing barriers.
"President uses government closure to try to impose a costly and inefficient wall on the American people Democrats have proposed two bills that separate arguments over wall of government shutdown" Monday, the new Speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, and the leader of the Senate minority, Chuck Schumer.
Yet, at the time of the close of its tenth day, it is clear that the House Democrats project to take the first legislative measure since the beginning of the closure of about a quarter of the Federal government remains a non-government for the Republicans to control the room on the other side of the US Capitol.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of the Kentucky region said he would not advance any legislation until President Donald Trump approved it. Trump, for one, did not hesitate to assert that the fight was a promise he had promised during the election campaign and that he was telling councilors and friends that he was ready to continue.
"I've been campaigning on border security, which you can not have without a strong and powerful wall," tweeted Trump on Monday.
One of the closest allies to the President, Rep. Mark Meadows, Republican of North Carolina and Conservative House Freedom Caucus, said the House Democratic proposal "does not represent a serious attempt to secure our border or to find a compromise. "
Meadows, who frequently speaks with the president by phone, described the proposal as" non-starter "and stated that it" would not be a legitimate response at this impasse ".
Pelosi and Schumer, citing the bipartisan nature of the situation – funding measures and unanimous Senate support before the partial closure of a bill to fund the government until February 8, tried to reinforce rhetorical pressure on Republicans before votes in the House. They said the Senate Republicans would be "accomplices of President Trump" by continuing the closure if they decided not to act on the democratic plan of the House.
"It would be the pinnacle of the irresponsibility and political cynicism of Senate Republicans to now reject the same law that they had already supported," Democratic leaders said.
Over the past week, Democratic leaders have adopted several proposals to reopen the government before deciding to go ahead with the full funding program. Democrats in the House believe, however, that Democrats in the House have the effect of blurring the Republicans of the Senate and the White House, as negotiations for a compromise agreement for the reopening of the government remain in place. 39; impasse.
Senate Democrats support the democratic plan of the House. and Schumer (D-New York) and Pelosi (D-California) have been in constant contact and are on the same wavelength, said a senior Senate official, Democrat. Democratic leaders and democratic leaders discussed the idea with Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the largest Democrat sitting on the Senate Supply Committee, who urged them to adopt bipartisan measures approved by the Senate.
Democrats believe that it is advisable to separate the Department of Homeland Security. the funding – and the fight against the wall – of the other six bills because they think it puts Trump and the Republicans in the position of holding the other agencies and the fired workers hostage to the wall, said the # 39; wizard. Democrats believe that pressure will mount on Republicans while the closure is long overdue, the assistant said.
Negotiations on an agreement to open the government have been stalled for days, as lawmakers in the House and Senate have deserted the Capitol for the holidays and, without a vote, will probably not return before the start of the next Congress. This, according to several collaborators involved in the process, was seen as the beginning of unofficial talks, but there is still no clear path for an agreement.
For this to happen, the assistants of both parties recognize that some will have to leave positions that they have proclaimed extremely comfortable.
For Democrats, this means they will not put anything on the table beyond the current $ 1.3 billion for border security.
For the White House, the final position is more ambiguous: Vice President Mike Pence presented a $ 2.5 billion proposal for funding combining border security and priority funding for immigration on the table last week, but was rejected by Schumer. For its part, the President has not publicly endorsed this proposal or any other than his original $ 5 billion request.
But Trump made it clear, repeatedly on Twitter and in private conversations, that he was not recoiling on a fight backed by his base, his main allies at the Republican conference and his main supporters in circles conservative comments.
To a certain extent, Capitol Hill's Democratic and Republican advisers say it gave them a little idea of what the president would actually support in a final deal.
"No idea," said a senior GOP assistant. "We just have to let that play a little more at this point."
Source link
