[ad_1]
Oleksandr Khatskevich was apparently not concerned about the quality of the match of yesterday. Players Dvino and Dynamo, nodding the head of the result. Indeed, the winners are not judged, but what can be done about this instability?
Victory on Rennes, defeat of Shakhtar, home victory over Rennes – these three games, Dynamo, play the knife, closing the door to criticism. Despite the lack of stability in the results, there was stability in the conduct of the match. Then, it was possible to think of the regularity, because a match is an accident, two a trend and three – you know what. However, any logical chain in the context of the current "Dynamo" is a very unstable thing.
In the last three games, we can talk about another trend. Even a victory over "Mariupol" with a solid score of 4: 0 did not leave a feeling of saturation with fanatical fans of Dynamo Kyiv. And the next defeat "of Alexandria", as well as yesterday's victory over Astana in the Europa League, generally provoke the next panic attack among those who worry about the fate of Kiev.
The match was very pale. The goal was scored as part of a good combination and an observation shot from Verbich – almost all of the "Dynamo" quite positive, acquired for ninety minutes. Of course, artificial cover, of course, cool weather, of course, a long flight and the usual sports aggression of the Kazakhstan team in his field. But these are just excuses that do not add credibility to the coaching staff.
On the positive side, another point worth mentioning is the high efficiency. Dynamo scored a goal with two times in the plane and six shots in total. For comparison: "Astana" knocked on the door of Boyka 23 strikes, one struck on the frame, with two chips Boyko and the rest – in milk. So, perhaps this situation should be examined from a different angle: who is the doctor "Astana", the effectiveness of the offensive actions is it equal to zero?
Coup on goal for Dynamo (blue) and Astana (orange)
But all the opponents of Kiev will not be so defeated. The fact that one must be vigilant: ten "Astana" shots inflicted from the limits of the penalty area, ten – because of its limitations. Three other strikes took place in the goalkeeper zone (!). In other words, Dynamo's defense allowed the rival to play combinations for all tastes and complete the attacks in different ways. It is interesting to note that "Astana" did not submit any corner during the match.
Burda obtained the best coefficient of TTD, although he did not have much success in the selection, in the interceptions. Generally, the Dynamo will most often grab the ball without trying to keep it for the team. Kadar and Burda have become leaders in this component and Kendzora has been the most effective in terms of balloon interception.
By the way, he (Kendzori) and Mykolenko had a special role: to speed the flanks from one edge to the other. No, it was not a typical match with the opponents, but the Dynamo defenders, due to the accumulation of midfielders in the central zone, had to climb on the team attacks and land quickly on their half of the field while defending. Kendzori and Mikolenko did it well.
They were assisted by Tsigankov and Sidkley. It should be noted that Victor gave the greatest intensity in the area of the center line on the right flank. The hinges pulling more in the other half of the field, so it was harder to defend Mikolenko.
Key transfers "Dynamo" (blue) and "Astana" (orange). "Astana" threatened more often the Gates Boyka from the flank Mikolenko
In general, the obvious failure of Dynamo in the attack: Shaparenko, Verbich, Sidkley played very little with the ball. And Shepelev with Che Che have often found themselves at the epicenter of events, but have not always played the game. About one out of two of Dynamo's midfielders was in the direction of their own goal.
A game of Che Che and Shepelev passes. Nearly half of the gears are heading towards their own gate
This actually explains the high percentage of accuracy of transfers between Shepeleva and Che Che. Back to sin and Tsygankov, which makes talk about the general trend. "Dynamo" only made four rounds of aggravation against the 18th (!) – the opponent: the total advantage of "Astana" in the creature.
There were also a number of top gear that Dynamo likes to use in matches when the game is not that successful But often, guests lost the ball as a result of mistakes or pressure from the opponent. And the leader of this component is Verbich, who usually has not touched the field often. That is to say the effectiveness of Slovenian – extremely low; it is good that Benjamin scored his only goal at the door of someone else
It's worth talking about Garmasha, who played for a little over 25 minutes, and the percentage of defeats is identical to that of most players who played with the starting whistle.
Evaluating the level of tension will help the ball interception map, below. Blue points are interceptions of the ball in Dynamo's performance. It can be seen that out of fourteen interceptions, five took place in or near their own repair area. In "Astana" – no interception on their doorstep, because the rival has not put forward such a requirement. "Astana" headed boldly to another half of the field and picked up / lost balls there. It is important that, at the loss of the hosts, they are not subject to a counter-attack. There was nothing to fear for "Astana".
Dynamo won first place in the tournament table and added Ukraine to the table of UEFA coefficients. But can that block all the disadvantages observed in the Kiev game? Khatskevich focuses on the result, recognizing only the errors of play. But he does not recognize that the victory was more accidental.
[ad_2]
Source link
