[ad_1]
"All I can tell you is that I certainly have not plagiarized in my book," Abramson told Fox News host Martha MacCallum in a statement. interview to promote the book, published Tuesday.
Less than an hour before In his interview with MacCallum, Michael Moynihan, correspondent of "Vice News Tonight", had accused Abramson on Twitter of plagiarizing several passages from his book.
Moynihan gave several examples in which the language used by Abramson was similar to the language that appeared elsewhere.
Moynihan says he discovered the problems while trying to check his book, which describes four newsrooms – Vice, BuzzFeed, The Times and The Washington Post – in the midst of a period of journalistic upheaval.
corroborating certain statements, I noticed that it also contained … plagiarized passages, "he tweeted
Abramson did not seem prepared for MacCallum's questions on the subject.
"Do you have any comments on this? "Asked MacCallum
" I really do not know, "replied Abramson.
MacCallum continued to advance, informing Abramson that she" was going to be asked to answer. "
Abramson replied Refuting charges of plagiarism and stating that his book included "70 pages of footnotes" at the end "indicating where I got the information."
MacCallum asked if Abramson had simply forgotten to insert footnotes in the affected areas, where she is accused of plagiarism.
"No, I do not think that's a problem," Abramson replied.
Abramson added: "Many Vice people have challenged the book, it seems that … I think they do not do it … like the depiction of Vice."
Abramson no. did not respond to a request for comment from CNN Business on Wednesday night.
A representative of Simon & Schuster, who published Abramson's book, also did not respond to multiple requests for comment from CNN Business.
Abramson's book was first scrutinized in January, when an unfinished copy of the galley was provided in advance to various journalists for re-reading. Some "Merchants of Truth" journalists have accused him of factual errors.
At the time, she noted in a tweet that the distributed copy was a draft and not the final version.
Source link
