[ad_1]
Judge Randolph Moss wrote that those who challenged the asylum restrictions considered that it was a case related to the safety of persons and that it was that, despite the closure, the deadlines for filing the files remained in force. The next files will have to be submitted to the court on January 4th.
On Wednesday, government prosecutors petitioned the court to defer "all information deadlines" in the context of a lawsuit filed on behalf of six people barred from seeking bail. asylum because they had entered the United States. States illegally.
In November, Trump signed a proclamation to prevent migrants crossing the southern border illegally from seeking asylum. However, shortly thereafter, a California judge blocked the administration's policy.
The Department of Justice told the court that in the absence of credit, lawyers and federal defendants were prohibited from working, even on a voluntary basis, except in very limited circumstances . including "emergencies involving the safety of life of persons or the protection of property."
Similar requests from the GM were presented Wednesday in several federal civil litigation cases.
The government asked Moss to postpone the schedule of briefings and the production of an administrative file indefinitely until the lawyers were allowed to resume the usual activities of the dispute, adding that they "regret strongly "any disturbance in the case.
In his order, Moss cites plans for downsizing the administration, claiming that people work in immigration courts. DHS: "The Court further notes that, according to government reports, 48% of employees of the Executive Board this for Immigration Review are excepted" to handle all immigration cases and appeals involving detained foreigners ". and about 91% of Customs and Border Protection employees and 81% of Immigration and Customs Enforcement employees will be retained after the credits are exhausted. "
At the closing, the courts of the 39, immigration will proceed as planned for "detained" cases – hearing of persons currently in detention. However, according to the Department of Justice website, "unreserved" business will be postponed until after the resumption of funding.
The Department of Justice declined to comment on Moss' decision and the complainants did not respond to CNN's request.
Moss accepted an aspect of the Department of Justice's application, namely the production of an administrative record that would be "identical" to the document produced in the course of the lawsuit before the court California. Both cases challenge the restrictions of asylum imposed by the administration, but invoke different legal arguments.
Lawyers for asylum seekers did not "consent" at the request of the Ministry of Justice, but did not take a position on the production of the administrative record, according to the court. Deposit.
In an independent case, Moss granted the request of the Department of Justice to suspend the delay in a lawsuit regarding Democrats' request for additional documents related to Kavanaugh under the law on freedom of information.
On the basis of credible screening and fear determinations, Judge Emmet Sullivan granted the request of the Department of Justice to suspend the time limits.
In this case, the judge asked the government to warn the court when the credits are reinstated or if a permanent resolution is passed.
In another case related to the separation of the family, Justice Paul L. Friedman also accepted the government without opposition. request for suspension of all deadlines due to the closure of the government.
DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec declined to comment Wednesday on the ministry's many requests for time.
Source link
