[ad_1]
However, the injunction only applies to the coalition of 13 democratic states, plus the District of Columbia, which took the case to court.
In his ruling, Judge Haywood Gilliam, Jr., stated that states "were potentially threatened" with consequences for public health and taxation of the implementation of the final settlement. "
He noted that states would face additional costs of providing contraceptive care in clinics to their residents and a higher rate of unwanted pregnancies." In the meantime, eligible entities can still to take advantage of exemptions or to request adjustments to the mandate.
"The law could not be clearer. Employers have no reason to interfere in women's health decisions, "said California Attorney General Xavier Becerra at the head of the group." Today's decision by the court puts an end to another attempt by the Trump administration to trample women's access to basic reproductive care. "Obtain derogations from the mandate of the Affordable Care Act by requiring them to provide insurance for contraceptives without cost-sharing.
A spokesman for the Pennsylvania Attorney General did not immediately return a request for comment Sunday on the status of the case.
The rules must come into force in states that are not part of the trial on January 14.
The first would allow nonprofit and for-profit employers, including publicly traded companies, to benefit from an exemption. n according to their religious beliefs. The second would leave all corporations except public corporations to obtain an exemption based on moral objections. Government employers can not ask for exemptions.
Under the Obama administration, a fairly limited number of employers – mainly churches and other religious entities – could obtain an exemption.
Others, such as universities or religious hospitals, may apply for accommodations not to be required to provide coverage, but their employees could still be paid for contraceptives by the insurer or the administrator of the employer's plan.
Democratic states have successfully challenged the interim rules of the Trump administration in federal court. Pennsylvania won a national injunction in late 2017, blocking the effort. California, which was leading a coalition of blue states, has also secured the success of its efforts to put an end to the provisional rules, although a court of appeal has recently limited its field of custody. 39, application to the five states that brought the lawsuit.
