[ad_1]
The extraordinary story published Friday night in the New York Times titled "F.B.I. Inquiry into whether Trump was working or not on behalf of Russia "tells us how seriously Washington's establishment was.
A group of bureaucrats – elected by no one – sit in a room and decide that they will investigate the new president of the United States for possible betrayal. Let me repeat: betrayal. This is, after all, the implication of this investigation.
This group of bureaucrats is not elected. In a justice department where employees paid 97% of their contributions to Hillary Clinton during the presidential campaign, hostility toward the newly elected president, Mr. Trump, was profound.
NEWT GINGRICH: MUELLER'S SURVEY STARTS FROM A HUNTER TO AN INQUISITION OF TROMP AND ALLIES
Senior Officials of the Department of Justice (all promoted under the Obama administration) were clearly willing to do everything possible to repudiate the verdict pronounced by the American people in the 2016 elections [19659003] In addition, there were officials of the Ministry of Justice who had ignored the scandals of the Clinton Foundation, downplayed the investigation into the email and internet scandal of Clinton and ignored that former President Clinton was collecting money from Russians to abroad while his wife was secretary of state.
Suddenly, these hitherto passive, impartial, and tolerant "law enforcement" bureaucrats were urged to investigate a president
When they made this decision, with whom they did not do anything. did they share? Obviously, they could not go to President Trump because he was the target of their investigation.
In an orderly world, they might have contacted Vice President Mike Pence. After all, Pence was a member of the United States House and Governor of Indiana before being vice president. There is no trace of scandal involving anything that Pence has ever done.
If these anti-Trump fanatics of the Department of Justice were afraid to go to the White House, they could have informed the officials of the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees in the House. and the Senate. At this point, they could have faced a certain potential reality.
President Trump did not betray the Constitution. Nothing proves that he ever thought of betraying his country for the Russians. It is the bureaucrats of the Ministry of Justice who betrayed the Constitution.
As former Trump attorney John Dowd said on Saturday: "The New York Times story is an unintentional revelation and verification of the total corruption of their oaths by Director of the New York Times. FBI, James) Comey and his colleagues will undermine the free election of the President of the United States. That would apparently have been done under the supervision of the Deputy Attorney General, who would be willing to carry a thread to trap President Trump. This is the substance of banana republics and dictatorships. This despicable and illegal official conduct undermines our entire federal criminal justice system that protects our freedom as a free people. "
This dishonest investigation eventually turned into an investigation led by Special Advocate Robert Mueller that ruined lives, kept Americans in solitary confinement and coerced confessions by threatening life-destroying criminal prosecutions and financial bankruptcy.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE APP FOX NEWS
President Trump did not betray the Constitution .. Nothing proves that he ever considered betraying his country for the Russians It is the bureaucrats of the Ministry of Justice who betrayed the Constitution
To flee this report to the New York Times rather than submit it to the Congress is that it is not the same. another example of the willingness of Justice Department officials to break the rules and undermine the rule of law in favor of the rule of power, which also exposes their alliance with the liberal media to undermine and, if possible, , destroy the duly elected US President.
CLICK HERE TO KNOW AGAIN BY NEWT GINGRICH
Source link
