[ad_1]
"We are going to be in Iowa and Wisconsin We are starting in Wisconsin because, as you remember, there was not a lot of campaigning in Wisconsin in 2016. With me , it changes … I'll be there often. "
If you can not find the reference, it's up to this: Hillary Clinton lost Wisconsin against Donald Trump in 2016, the first Democrat to losing the Badger State since 1984. Clinton believed that the state was in the bag, and did not campaign there during the race in the general election. Not even once.
"There is a place where we were taken by surprise, that is Wisconsin." The polls showed us a comfortable lead until the end. for Democratic Senate candidate Russ Feingold, 133 people in the field spent close to $ 3 million on television, but if our data (or anyone else's) had shown that we were in danger, we would have of course invested even more, "she wrote. "I would have torn up my schedule, designed on the basis of the best information we had, and camped there."
The absence of a visit to Wisconsin has become, for many Democrats, the symbol of the fatal error of the Clinton campaign: It simply took the industrial Midwest for granted – and watched as Trump won Wisconsin , Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, and with those states, the White House. In the Midwest, most Democratic politicians – especially those who want to be named as the party's president for 2020 – have avoided directly criticizing the way the former secretary of state had conducted her campaign. This reluctance is usually explained in two ways: 1) Talking about what the Democrats did wrong in the past is not a way to solve the problem of beating Donald Trump in the future and 2) Clinton – and her husband – remain important personalities within the Democratic Party. Partying and crossing them is not a good idea.
This is why Klobuchar specifically targeted Clinton and his campaign was all the more intriguing.
In case you think about it – and I know some of you are out there! – Klobuchar did not really want to say that she was out of touch with Clinton's way of doing things, consider that Wisconsin's presidential primaries are currently set for April 7, 2020. That's more than two months after the first votes. should be thrown into Iowa. So, there is no reason to go that early, if it is as a symbolic way to show that Klobuchar will not take the Midwest for granted – as she clearly lets Clinton hear.
In truth, Clinton's coup could be a kind of necessary by-product of Klobuchar's broader discourse to distinguish himself from the rest of the growing field of 2020: I may not be the best-known candidate neither the best funded, but I know how to win in the place of the best known and the best funded candidate could not last time.
All campaigns are taking place in the spectrum of the last race, especially when the latter was a defeat.What Klobuchar did, is to recognize the specter that reigns in the hall, stating that she thought that Clinton made a very big mistake and pledged not to repeat this mistake.
It's a clear strategy, but is it the one who reports?
Source link
