Our estimates. Astana – Dynamo – football.ua

PHOTO: Dynamo FC
November 30, 2018, 09:00

Denis Boyko – 6, 0 . Somehow rehabilitated for past failures. Denis' score could have been higher if there had not been the episode of the starting minutes, when the Kiev goalkeeper made an error that did not been used by a miracle. The rest was reliability itself. The save of Boyko after a shot by Rukavina, who then passed the crossbar, proved particularly brilliant.

Tomash Kendzer – 5.0 . He showed no activity during the attack, but he was several times stupidly inferior to the opponents of his own flank. In the 74th minute, he openly "missed" Murtazaev's stubbornness and it is a miracle that the ball did not hit the target after hitting the Astana player.

Nikita Burda – 6.0 . Worked to consciousness. Often he won the second floor, but was particularly noticed at the end of the first quarter minute: it was Nikita who literally took the ball off the grid. Defense partners often insured.

Tamas Kadar – 6.0 . As a partner in the Burda Defense Center, the Hungarian fought well. Tamas' level of engagement was the highest, and often an experienced quarter neutralized the host offensive line.

Vitaly Mikolenko – 4.5 . From the start of the match, it was Vitaly's control zone that Dynamo received the most dangerous rounds on their doorstep. Sometimes the young defender simply did not follow his opponents and rarely showed up in front of him in an unusual way.

Vladimir Shepelev – 5.5 . I tried it, but it did not make much sense. In the destructive phase, it was more or less effective, however, few times were connected to attacks, and even then without much brilliance.

Che Che – 5.5 . On the one hand, the mistake made by the Brazilian almost led to the ball cashed in the opening, on the other hand, Che Che actively participated in the goal of Dynamo. In the destruction worked with varying success. At the end of the match, I was frankly tired and, once at the cost of a warning, I interrupted a potentially dangerous counterattack of Astana.

Victor Tsygankov – 6.0 . One of the best in the composition of Kiev, even if you do not take a spectacular assistant on Verbich. He tried before, but he was helpful in defensive actions.

Nikolai Shaparenko – 5.0 . Despite the fact that the midfielder took part in the decisive attack, he was otherwise unrecognizable. Marriage in the programs and positional errors followed one another, after which Shaparenko was replaced in the middle of the second half.

Sidkley – 5.0 . It was very remarkable that the Brazilian did not understand why he entered the field. Sidkley was not really speaking to the pitch and almost did not help the partners in the creation.

Benjamin Verbić – 6.5 . Certainly the hero of the match. In many ways, of course, because of the winning goal. Benjamin before the goal was scored and after the rim was not very active, while helping partners a lot in the depths of the field. In the end, he was a little tired and for tactical reasons (yes, in order to keep the necessary score), he was replaced by Sidorchuk.

Denis Garmash – 4.5 . Coming off the bench at the equator of the second half, Dynamo did not bring anything to the match. In the fight on the center bridgehead, the winner was not always the winner, but at the end of the game, he still received a yellow card.

Sergey Sidorchuk – 4.5 . A huge number of marriages, a lack of confidence in the action and a completely incomprehensible decision during an attack in the 89th minute – such are the defender's dark luggage. Sergey did not keep pace with his opponents in the middle of the field, which resulted in increased nervousness.

Nikolay Morozyuk spent too little time on the field and did not play any evaluation.

Football.ua