[ad_1]
"Very often the chair would say, here's what I want to do, and here's how I want to do it, I should say to him: Mr. Chair, I understand what you want to do, but you can not do it. That's how the law is broken. "
The President of the United States would tell the Secretary of State how he wanted things to be done and the Secretary of State should tell him that it could not be done as he wished. because it was illegal?
All is well!
What's scary about Tillerson's confession? Some things.
1) Trump does not know the law or does not care about the law
Time and time again – especially in his interactions with the Department of Justice – Trump showed that he understood nothing about the limits of his work.
Tillerson describes Trump as "an unruly man who does not like reading, does not read briefing reports, does not like going into the details of many things, but rather says," Here what I believe. "" 19659004] This approach is broadly in line with Trump's experience in the private sector. In business, he largely did what he wanted: the rules (and consequences) are cursed. If the situation went bad, the penalty was usually bankruptcy – and Trump thought he could get by and escape that sort of thing.
Trump never understood the distinction that existed between the head (figurehead, say) of a company and being the president of the United States. In his dealings with Sessions – and Tillerson – Trump assumes that they will do whatever he tells them to do because he is the boss.
The idea that Tillerson, Sessions and the rest of the administration ultimately serve a) the country's population and b) the rule of law is apparently lost to Trump.
This session is challenged to avoid any bias bias in the investigation – you know, for the sake of the country and all the rest – was totally lost to Trump. His reaction to the situation was this: it's bad for me and Sessions should not have done it.
Which says everything, really.
Trump's complete ignorance of the law – whether it is voluntary or just pure obtuse – is, at this stage, a defining feature of his presidency. He simply does not understand that his power is limited, put in place to preserve the mandate of the presidency – and the broader institutions of our democracy.
The Point : We have a president who, according to his former director of the FBI and his first secretary of state, has repeatedly proposed ideas contrary to the laws in force. Sit down with that for a minute.
Source link
