Senate Republicans Draft Short-Term Agreement to Prevent Government from Closing



[ad_1]

The decision to go ahead with the short-term plan has not yet been finalized, sources said. There are still senators who urge the GOP leaders to negotiate for a larger deal.

No final decision will likely be made until at least Wednesday, sources said, and President Donald Trump has yet to agree.

Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York told reporters earlier Tuesday that Democrats would "seriously" consider supporting a short-term spending measure.

This proposal follows a radical change in the position of the White House in the negotiations. Trump had initially refused to yield to his $ 5 billion request for funding from the Border Wall, a non-citizen for the Democrats who hinted at the possibility of a partial closure of the government.

A compromise seemed unlikely after a televised meeting at the Oval Office last week, when Trump clashed with Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat and Schumer, minority leader in the Senate, House of Representatives, on the need for Financing. The president ended up appropriating a possible closure.

"I'll tell you what, I'm proud to close the government for border security, Chuck," Trump told the highest Democratic senator. "So, I'll take the torch, I'll be the one to close it, I will not blame you."

But the White House press secretary, Sarah Sanders, suggested Tuesday that the White House could accept a compromise bill to keep the government open, because "we have other ways to reach that $ 5 billion. "

"We will work with the Congress if it ensures that a bill is passed that provides not only for the financing of the wall, but a bill was passed: the Democrats voted to 26 votes to 5 in committee, providing about $ 26 billion for border security, including $ 1.6 billion for the wall, "she told Fox News. "It's something we would be able to support if we could link it to other funding resources."

Schumer had previously proposed such a bill to avoid a closure, but retracted it last week because it would not have been passed. The House, in part because of the House Democrats' opposition to financing the $ 1.6 billion wall.

[ad_2]
Source link