[ad_1]
Judge Peter Messitte ordered that the initial disclosure of evidence be held by the end of the month as part of a lawsuit brought by the Attorneys General of DC and Maryland states. They should receive the rest of the evidence sought, as well as the evidence, by June at the latest.
In the lawsuit, they allege that the President violated a constitutional clause banning gifts and benefits from foreign and domestic governments because of his family's involvement in the Trump Hotel in Washington.
Maryland and DC stated that Trump International hotel activities were close to competitively disadvantaged hotels and entertainment venues, and that the Trump Hotel obtained special tax benefits for the hotel, which got its lease on a property owned by the federal government prior to Trump's election.
D.C. Attorney General Karl A. Racine applauded Monday's decision, saying subpoenas were being prepared: "We will now serve subpoenas on third-party organizations and federal agencies to gather the necessary evidence. to prove that President Trump violates the provisions of the Constitution with respect to original anti-corruption laws. "
The state will likely name several organizations with ties to Trump, including the government. Trump organization and the management company that manages the assets of the president.
The Department of Justice said that he could apply to the 4th US circuit. The Court of Appeal intervenes to terminate the discovery process.
Trump's lawyer wrote in court on Monday that the president had to participate in various judicial activities in the case, including "drafting, negotiating, and negotiating a protection order." a discovery protocol for electronically stored information ", indicating that the president may have been pre-informed When he advances, he can no longer communicate publicly or to other outsiders with information regarding Trump International Hotel.
His attorney argued that "the President will have to consider the flow of requests for discovery and responses that other parties trade, and he will also have to consider the important discovery of the third party requested by the plaintiffs" .
Messitte's decision in July proposed the term" emolument "as essentially prohibiting the President from receiving" anything but a profit, gain or de minimis advantage "in private.
The court has not yet determined whether Trump as an individual can be sued, his personal attorney asked the court to hold a hearing on this subject.
Source link
