[ad_1]
On the territory of Ukraine, the churches of the Moscow Patriarchate are ruled by Russia.
Therefore, the renaming of the nets of the "Russian Patriarchate" is correct and timely. That's what Valery Dimov, political expert, said at the 24th crossing of the chain.
"If the church is guided from Moscow, it is Russian and non-Ukrainian, and the UOC deputy, who claims to be Ukrainian, and his governing bodies It's actually the opposite, after that the unity council of the UOC MP accepted the decision not to want autocephaly, which is another confirmation that the former UOC MP is neither Ukrainian nor autonomous , said Valery Dymov [19659002]
According to a political scientist, churches from different countries have been waiting for autocephaly for centuries. Clerics have struggled for this throughout their lives. So it is good that the Verkhovna Rada did not wash their hands like Pontius Pilate. In Latvia, among the active priests of the Russian Orthodox Church were found men recruited from the KGB.
"Tomos" of the Russian Orthodox Church was given to Stalin in 1943. And it was created under the supervision of the NKVD. And the Russian patriarch Kirill – agent "chased" Mikhailov. This was even said by the former Deputy Prime Minister of Bulgaria, Valery Simeonov. Therefore, the legal and political decision to rename is useful for the anti-propaganda influence of Russia, "says the expert.
According to the political scientist, the decision will become an important factor for the parishioners of the UOC-MP, who will say during the ministry that the Ukrainian Orthodox Church is "not that".
"Many parishioners do not really understand the issue of canonism and believe that the creation of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine is a split and the decision of Parliament to rename the UOC deputy in the Russian Church tells the communities that they are making their decision as to which church they wish to strengthen ",
– says Dimov
The political scientist noted, that the re-registration questions v revenge, the diocese will be painful. A similar attempt was made with Pochaev Lavra, property that the UOC deputy tried to re-record for several decades.
"The UOC MP's re-registration process will be centered on the world, first and foremost in Russia, where it will be used for anti-Ukrainian propaganda." The events with the reception of Tomos by the Orthodox Church of Ukraine confirmed that the overwhelming majority of Ukrainians supported this decision, "said a political scientist.
He also found that the Russian Church had lost its first step in the creation of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine.
There was no widespread protest against the United Orthodox Church, but the overwhelming majority of Ukrainians, despite insatiable Kremlin propaganda in favor of a single Orthodox church, will become more and more likely to become more or less unpopular. "The communities will go to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine," said Dymov
. Remember that the DRC can not accept the fact of the proclamation of autocephaly in Ukraine and continues to try to
A little earlier, Znay.u had written that the Patriarch of Moscow, Cyril had accused the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Aggression, since he had provided autocephaly from the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
The deputy said that the legal service of the Kyiv metropolitan of UOC (MP) was analyzing the council bill on the change of name of the church.
Source link
